- The Mother of All CPU Charts 2005/2006
- Single-Core CPUs Ain't Dead Yet
- Virtual Infrastructure Summit At VMWorld 2005
- Pentium, Schmentium: Decoding CPU Names
- Intel's Next-Generation Server Promises
- Intel Moves From Dual Core To Double Core
- A Sneak Peak at Intel's 65 nm Pentium 4
- Dual-Core, Simple Price: Athlon 64 X2 3800+
- A Dissatifying Compromise With AMD's 64 bit Sempron 3400+
- The Athlon 64 FX Overclocked to 3 GHz
- some SAD news to AMD fans.
- What's this I hear about a new Phenom?
- Anand does Nehalem!!!
- THGC Needs You -Team 40051
- Second opinion. q9450
- 550 FSB!!!!
- Xigmatek -- lapping and change stock fan
- A simple question about overclocking
- Pentium D 960 @4.16 GHz vs QUAD CORE Q6700 @ 2.66 GHz in games
- Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide
Are Three Cores Better Than Two? : The Opteron Multicore Mixup
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: cores
Syndication:
The Opteron Multicore Mixup

For AMD and Intel, it is just a matter of time before single-core processors become a thing of the past. The future thus belongs to devices that might pack two or eventually more than a dozen physical processing units onto a single physical die. However, it is a common assumption that processor cores have to come in even numbers, which is, in fact, not the case.
When we compared a dual-core and a dual-processor system, we first mentioned the possibility that the two might work. IBM's processor for the Xbox 360 is a triple core, which is a pretty good indicator that this configuration is viable. Although the power requirements are clearly different, there is, after all, no difference between single- and dual-core processors.
For our dual-core and dual-processor article, we used an Asus K8N-DL Socket 940 dual Opteron motherboard. For the processors, we used the same single- and dual-core Opterons from our previous project. Both the Opteron 248 and 275 run at 2.2 GHz, with the latter being the dual-core product.

- Next page Get Ready For Multi Processing