- 500 MHz FSB? Core 2 Duo Overtakes Core 2 Extreme
- Can AMD'S 65 nm Core Fight Back?
- Overclocking Guide Part 2: Suggested Components and Settings
- Overclocking Guide Part 1: Risks, Choices and Benefits
- Quad-Core Xeon Clovertown Rolls Into DP Servers
- AMD's 4x4 Platform & Athlon 64 FX-70 - Brute Force Quad Cores
- Kentsfield Released: Core 2 Quad Core Ready to Ravage the High-End
- Intel Xeon and AMD Opteron Battle Head to Head
- Cheap Thrills: Core 2 Duo E6400 Overclocked to 3.33 GHz
- IDF Fall 2006: From Core 2 Quadro to 80 Cores
- CPU Buyers' Guide (updated 10 May 2008)
- Urgent! CPU Temp too high???????
- Conroe Temperature Sensors / Readings
- Modern CPU Toastin'
- CPU Advice and Overclocking
- HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - Guide v1.6.1
- Guide to ATI BIOS modding and flashing
- Help in understanding V-core
- Guide to overclocking the A64
- Is it worth Overclocking?
-
Overclocking Guide Part 2
-
overclocking guide part 3
-
overclocking guide
-
wusy overclocking guide
-
part 2
-
part 1
-
part 3
-
build part 1
-
X38 Comparison Part
-
how to build a pc part
-
x38 comparison part 2
-
AVIVO HD vs Purevideo HD Part
-
overclocking am2
-
overclocking cpus
-
overclocking failed
-
overclocking 7800 gs
-
E6550 overclocking
-
e6600 overclocking
-
overclocking marathon
-
overclocking E2160
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: overclocking, guide, part, 1
Topics: Overclocking
Syndication:
Step One: Maximum Stable CPU Speed
One of the problems we encountered in previous motherboard overclock testing was an early BIOS revision that had not yet been fully optimized for FSB stability. Updating it to version F9 was easily accomplished using a USB thumb drive, made bootable via Hewlett Packard's USB Format Utility and set as first hard drive in BIOS.

We disabled unused CPU features and those that would otherwise contradict our manual frequency and voltage selections.

The first step in finding the highest CPU speed is to make sure RAM remains stable. We used lazy 5-5-5-15 timings with the chipset's lowest "2.00 memory multiplier", a setting which is actually 1.0 times the CPU FSB, and misnamed as a ratio of memory data rate (DDR) to FSB clock rate.

Next, we increased CPU core voltage to 1.45V, DIMM voltage to +0.4V (2.20V), and Northbridge voltage to +0.3V (1.55V).

Knowing the relatively high limits of our CPU, we jumped directly to 366 MHz before following our recommended 8 MHz steps between stability tests. This was where our first test deviation occurred: some speeds between 380 MHz and 400 MHz were unstable, while other higher speeds were perfectly fine. Increasing FSB voltage by 0.20 V got us past 420 MHz, but again, with some settings in the middle not working correctly. Choosing the +0.30 V setting eliminated all FSB stability issues and allowed us to shoot for the moon!

Notice that we have not yet increased the PCI Express voltage. We tested the setting to see if it would improve Southbridge stability, but the CPU still reached the same limit.
You'd like to see that limit, right?

We're seeing a lot of 2 MB cache Core 2 Duo chips reaching similar speeds at voltages similar to our 1.45 V setting; your later-revision core may do even better than this early B1 S5 stepping. Congratulations to Gigabyte's BIOS team for turning this into a serious overclocking board.
- Previous page Our Component Choices, Continued
- Next page Step Two: Best Stable Memory Timings