- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for the Money: February 2008
- ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 - Fastest Yet!
- Crossfire Meets PCI Express 2.0
- Exclusive: Nvidia GeForce 9800GX2
- Exclusive: New AMD Radeon 3400 HD Series
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for the Money: January 2008
- Nvidia's GeForce 8800 GTS 512 MB
- Overclock Your Graphics Card in 5 Minutes
- AMD Radeon HD 3800: ATI Strikes Back
- 6 Graphics Cards with Luxury Trimmings
- Just got The Phenom 9850Be today!!!
- Need a little advice on components
- Need help chooseing a PSU
- Think I could get $300 for a AMD 4000+ PC?
- Phenom 9700, AMD's 1st Quad-Core CPU
- AGP and PCI-e on one motherboard?
- AMD XP 2800+ Overcloking help!
- new overclocked scores
- I want to buy a new mobo and i dont know what to do...
- Abit IP35-E vs. IL9Pro
The First GeForce 9?
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: nvidia, geforce, 9600, gt
Syndication:
The First GeForce 9?

The card we're testing today is the very first GeForce 9! The first surprise is that this new generation of cards is not being introduced at the high end, as has always been the case, but rather the midrange, mainstream price point. In reality, there's a very simple explanation for this phenomenon: the architecture behind this card is the same as that introduced on the GeForce 8, and hardly improved with the arrival of the midrange versions (the 8600 GT, then the 8800 GT, as has been Nvidia's custom since the GeForce 6 series).
A few weeks back, we criticized AMD's decision to call its cards based on the RV670 "Radeon HD 3000," but Nvidia's attitude is even more reprehensible given the extremely short list of differences - no new API supported and no reworking of the stream processors - between this GeForce 9600 GT and the GeForce 8800 GT. After GeForce 7800s that at the time already didn't really seem to deserve the name GeForce 6900, the Nvidia marketing department has gone even farther, and seems to have taken us back to the dark hours of the GeForce 4 MX. It's a disturbing sign of the new slowdown in evolution and technological competition that the two makers seem to be engaged in. Still, let's give credit where credit is due: the bang-for-the-buck ratio of the midrange solutions that have emerged since the end of 2007 is exceptional.
Join our discussion on this article!
- Previous page Introduction
- Next page The G94: Half a G92?