- Mar 7, 2013
- 157
- 0
- 10,710
Iwas interested to see how an 8350 OC'ed to 4.5 would do. Along with a 1150/1300 7950.
But after a good few months, I decided to put everything back on stock - cpu(4.2 boost) and gpu(925/1250). See how it performs.
I've found that my GPU, overclocked alone produces a 3-5% increase in min FPS with Arkham City, maxed, but not change at all in average/max fps.
My CPU overclocked alone also affects nothing in that game or any of my games for that matter. Benchmarks comes out the same using ingame or Fraps.
Of course every setup is different.
I might just go back to stock for good.
I have a feeling I'd have to OC to 5.0 to see a much more significant performance increase.
My real question here is: Is overclocking worth the possible risks , but with a 5-10% increase?
How do you guys feel about your own OC'd increase?
But after a good few months, I decided to put everything back on stock - cpu(4.2 boost) and gpu(925/1250). See how it performs.
I've found that my GPU, overclocked alone produces a 3-5% increase in min FPS with Arkham City, maxed, but not change at all in average/max fps.
My CPU overclocked alone also affects nothing in that game or any of my games for that matter. Benchmarks comes out the same using ingame or Fraps.
Of course every setup is different.
I might just go back to stock for good.
I have a feeling I'd have to OC to 5.0 to see a much more significant performance increase.
My real question here is: Is overclocking worth the possible risks , but with a 5-10% increase?
How do you guys feel about your own OC'd increase?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram