ubercake :
There's more than cooling that is an advantage of using an H80. It takes the bulk of the cooler and moves it to an exhaust port making it easier to work on your motherboard, doesn't block your RAM slots and doesn't put any stress on your motherboard. Is 2C worth a large, metal obstacle inside your case?
You're glossing over the issue. It's only a 2C difference if you make if 15 dB louder. It is a full 12C hotter at the same noise level. This is not a small difference. This is the difference between a good cooler and an
awful cooler.
Also, my air cooler doesn't block my RAM slots, like most air coolers, and it's perfectly easy to work around it in my case. Stress on the motherboards is some idiocy Tom's was spouting a few months back, and I don't buy it. Who cares if the computer is more likely to break in shipping? I am not shipping my computer, who does aside from people like Tom's? It was honestly bewildering when they started saying that, my guess is it's just more influence from corporate shills who weren't happy that the truth about their garbage coolers came out.
Also, who the hell needs more than 1TB for a gaming machine? Do you go out and buy every game available and put them on your TBs of hard drive space, then decide which to play? Massive amounts of storage are not too key for a gaming machine. If massive amounts of storage is your goal, maybe drop a NAS onto your network?
Despite what you may think, people do tend to use their computer for more than one task. "Gaming machine" doesn't mean "I will only ever game on this machine and never ever do anything else, I promise." My gaming machine has 5TB of used storage and climbing. And no, this is not from a massive collection of pirated movies, it's mostly OS disc images, virtual machines and rips of my Blu-Rays so they'll be available on the Roku.
And why spend a large amount of extra money on a NAS when you can spend much less money and just put it directly in the computer? A NAS is meant to solve a very particular problem, sharing storage across multiple devices, not to boost the storage of a single device. We already have a good way to do that, and it's to buy a bigger hard drive like I said.
Yeah, willard, I'm sure you have experience with both crossfire and SLI. Based on my experience with crossfire and all the driver issues and perceivable microstutter that goes along with it, I'll most likely not shop for another AMD video card any time soon.
I do, actually. Used SLI GTX 9800s at work for years (for powering a complex and inefficient 3D display). been using Crossfire 7970s for the last 8 months. My Crossfire 7970s perform just fine, thank you, as did my GTX 9800s.
When you assume, you make an ass out of u and me.
You can try to convince yourself you got a good deal on Radeon cards, but there's a reason you pay a little more for Nvidia cards. I learned this the expensive way.
This logic would make more sense if the 670 wasn't cheaper than the 7970s. You pay more for the 7970, and get more.
Also, check out any review SLI review compared to crossfire and you'll see that two cards in SLI scale better than two in crossfire.
Really?
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162973
Looks like just the opposite to me.
Based on my experience with SLI on multiple platforms with multiple generations of GPUS, there's no reason for me to think there's any other way to go.
http://techreport.com/review/22890/nvidia-geforce-gtx-690-graphics-card/7
tp99 frame latency is
still lower on 7970s in Crossfire, and this is comparing to 680s in crossfire, which will obviously beat the 670s in frame latency due to being more powerful. So yeah, the 7970s in crossfire are objectively better.
Nvidia doesn't ignore the needs of it's minority SLI base, the way the driver team over at AMD does.
Maybe go read patch notes instead of just telling me how AMD is ignoring me?
Yes the other power supply is up to the task. It's good enough and it's a quality supply. But it puts you right at the edge of your power requirement. Definitely not something to make a practice of.
The PSU is actually capable of providing a good deal more than 650W. I've seen people load them up with 750W+ and they still power the system fine. Rumor is it's not really a 650W PSU, but something much bigger so it can pull off the ludicrous efficiency, ripple and noise levels it does. My computer is so little stress on this thing that it doesn't even need to turn the fan on while gaming. JohnnyGuru loaded it past its peak output and put it in a hotbox at nearly 50C, still remained fanless and beat the 80+ Platinum requirements while doing it, class leading ripple and noise.
I'd never do this with any other 650W PSU, but the X 650 Gold is a monster.