hey im really confused because every one on toms hardware tells e that I wont be able to play crisis 3 on the best graphics with the gtx 660 Ti 2GB and 3.4ghz i5???? well my one other frend plays crisis 3 on its best graphics with only a gtx 560 Ti 1GB and his cpu is 2.93ghz i3???? I don't understand??????
am i realy missing something from the GTX 660 Ti 2GB???
- Thread starter charldon
- Start date
completelyrandomname
Honorable
- Aug 13, 2012
- 1,349
- 0
- 11,460
Of course you can max out Crysis 3.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S9qrWh20QU
A 7950 would be better overall though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S9qrWh20QU
A 7950 would be better overall though.
- Oct 30, 2004
- 32,255
- 14
- 99,960
The benchies on the two cards for Crysis and Crysis 2 are mixed
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660_Ti_Direct_Cu_II/12.html
Crysis2 @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 52.6 fps @ $255 = $4.85 per frame
7950 - 54.5 @ $270 = $4.95 per frame
Asus 660 Ti DCII - 56.1 @ $260 = $4.63 per frame
Crysis @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 44.2 fps @ $255 = $5.77 per frame
7950 - 45.5 @ $270 = $5.93 per frame
Asus 660 Ti DCII - 45.9 @ $260 = $5.66 per frame
http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/3026/11/nvidia-geforce-gtx-660-ti-review---3-way-sli-included-crysis-2
Crysis2 @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 60.8 fps @ $255 = $4.19 per frame
7950 - 50.3 @ $270 = $5.37 per frame
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/asus_geforce_gtx_660_ti_directcu_top_review,21.html
Crysis 2 @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 49 fps @ $255 = $5.20 per frame
7950 - 56 @ $270 = $4.82 per frame
Asus 660 Ti DCII - 53 @ $260 = $4.90 per frame
Average
660 Ti - 54.1 fps = $4.71 per frame
7950 - 53.6 fps = $5.03 per frame
It's a close run, w/ 2 outta 3 going to the 660 Ti on a cost per frame basis .... making it a toss up if considered based on Crysis and Crysis 2 alone. Overall the techpowerup article above gives a slight edge to the 7950 w/ 96% of the Asus 660 Ti's performance compared to the stock 660 Ti's 95%. That 1% advantage has to be considered against the relative price as you pay 6% more for that 1% performance gain. In short ....
-On a pure performance basis, overall, the 7950 has a 1% advantage over the stock 660 Ti
-On a cost per frame basis, overall, the 660 Ti has a 5% advantage over the stock 7950
However, the frame rate latency issue is another one to consider.
http://techreport.com/review/23981/radeon-hd-7950-vs-geforce-gtx-660-ti-revisited/11
If ya think ya might SLI / CF someday, peruse these:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/graphics-card-benchmarking-frame-rate,3466.html
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6857/amd-stuttering-issues-driver-roadmap-fraps/6
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Frame-Rating-Part-3-First-Results-New-GPU-Performance-Tools?page=2#comments
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660_Ti_Direct_Cu_II/12.html
Crysis2 @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 52.6 fps @ $255 = $4.85 per frame
7950 - 54.5 @ $270 = $4.95 per frame
Asus 660 Ti DCII - 56.1 @ $260 = $4.63 per frame
Crysis @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 44.2 fps @ $255 = $5.77 per frame
7950 - 45.5 @ $270 = $5.93 per frame
Asus 660 Ti DCII - 45.9 @ $260 = $5.66 per frame
http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/3026/11/nvidia-geforce-gtx-660-ti-review---3-way-sli-included-crysis-2
Crysis2 @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 60.8 fps @ $255 = $4.19 per frame
7950 - 50.3 @ $270 = $5.37 per frame
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/asus_geforce_gtx_660_ti_directcu_top_review,21.html
Crysis 2 @ 1920 x 1200
660 Ti - 49 fps @ $255 = $5.20 per frame
7950 - 56 @ $270 = $4.82 per frame
Asus 660 Ti DCII - 53 @ $260 = $4.90 per frame
Average
660 Ti - 54.1 fps = $4.71 per frame
7950 - 53.6 fps = $5.03 per frame
It's a close run, w/ 2 outta 3 going to the 660 Ti on a cost per frame basis .... making it a toss up if considered based on Crysis and Crysis 2 alone. Overall the techpowerup article above gives a slight edge to the 7950 w/ 96% of the Asus 660 Ti's performance compared to the stock 660 Ti's 95%. That 1% advantage has to be considered against the relative price as you pay 6% more for that 1% performance gain. In short ....
-On a pure performance basis, overall, the 7950 has a 1% advantage over the stock 660 Ti
-On a cost per frame basis, overall, the 660 Ti has a 5% advantage over the stock 7950
However, the frame rate latency issue is another one to consider.
http://techreport.com/review/23981/radeon-hd-7950-vs-geforce-gtx-660-ti-revisited/11
If ya think ya might SLI / CF someday, peruse these:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/graphics-card-benchmarking-frame-rate,3466.html
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6857/amd-stuttering-issues-driver-roadmap-fraps/6
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Frame-Rating-Part-3-First-Results-New-GPU-Performance-Tools?page=2#comments
swifty_morgan
Illustrious
- Feb 10, 2006
- 13,566
- 1
- 42,960
Fishwithadeagle
Honorable
- Nov 30, 2012
- 260
- 0
- 10,810
A lot of times it has to due with the resolution. 1080p sure, but not triple monitor with 8x antialiasing at 120 fps. It is all about resolution
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
News Firefox user loses 7,470 opened tabs saved over two years after they can’t restore browsing session- Started by Admin
- Replies: 58
-
Question Looking to upgrade my pc for more video and photo editing with light gaming.
- Started by fuzmaster
- Replies: 3
-
News Apple debuts M4 processor in new iPad Pros with 38 TOPS on neural engine
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 80
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Question GIGABYTE G6 KF - Randomly Switches from Charger to Battery Power under Heavy Load
- Latest: justice_for_gwimbly
-
Question DRAM light is on and the screen is black, how can I diagnose the issue?
- Latest: Valkyriavonkyburn
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram