GTX TITAN & Batman Arkham City performance issues

martijn397

Honorable
Apr 16, 2013
13
0
10,520
Hi All,

i have seen this issue numerous times and have not found any solution.

issue:
The performance of Batman Arkham city in DX11 have been dreadfull to say the least.
When i benchmark ingame i get these results:

minimum fps: 2
max fps: 40


My system:

Motherboard:
Asus Sabertooth X58

Processor:
Intel Core i7 950 @ stock 3,07Ghz

Internal memory:
12GB DDR3 tripple channel ram

Graphic:
Asus Geforce GTX Titan

Sound:
Asus Xonar Essence STX


I know there are many people with the same problem..... when i see benchmarks online i see results like max fps 100+.
Does anyone know whats going on and/or knows a solution?

Kind regards,
Martijn
 

Games master

Honorable
Apr 15, 2013
4
0
10,510
I think your cpu bottlenecks your gpu and your motherboard is not good for your gpu so you can change your motherboard to a z77 and buy a more powerful cpu to see the maximum power of your gtx titan
 


Not this at all.

Sorry I do not have advice but I can assure you this isn't it at all.
 

martijn397

Honorable
Apr 16, 2013
13
0
10,520


Thanks for the tip Games master, actually i was thinking about doing an upgrade and/or overclocking my CPU.
Whats keeping me from doing it is that ive seen many benchmarks about CPU's and all i can see are just a few more FPS in many of todays games so it didnt really justify an upgrade for me.

What are your thoughts?

btw, thanks for the help.
 

martijn397

Honorable
Apr 16, 2013
13
0
10,520


Thanks, according to many benchmarks i didnt see a difference also with CPU performance but still i wonder why some people with 670 and/or 680's do get a good FPS in DX11 allthough many experience the same problems.

 


The CPU doesn't bottleneck the GPU that much at all as exhibited in this article (look at the bottom of the page it's explained):
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_titan_review,13.html

It might be the drivers just aren't there yet. Are you using the same drivers they used in the reviews you saw? Or something released thereafter?
 

martijn397

Honorable
Apr 16, 2013
13
0
10,520


At the moment im using the latest drivers (314.22) which are also used in most benchmarks sinds the Titan sort of "recently" came out.

 

fkr

Splendid
At higher framerates, a ton of information is passed through the PCI-E interface as the GPU calls on the processor to fetch more frames. This potentially causes a lower bandwidth PCI-E bus to become saturated. At higher resolutions and image quality settings the GPU becomes the bottleneck so it calls for less frames from the CPU, leading to the PCI-E interface being less of a determining factor in overall performance.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/53901-nvidia-geforce-gtx-690-review-25.html

a gtx 690 will not bottleneck a pci-e 2 interface. skyrim will if you run it at 200 fps but even then it is only minor and does not matter since it is over 60 fps. According to the article this saturation of the pci-e interface happens because the cpu processes large graphics batch files and those files fill the pci-e lane. I guess that even if the resolution is twice as high it is still not as demanding as pushing triple the fps at a lower resolution, it is always more difficult to process data than it is to transport it.
 


Also wrong as the bandwidth provided by PCIE 2 is more than enough for a gtx 590 which is about as powerful as the titan

GM you are giving poor advice.
 

Games master

Honorable
Apr 15, 2013
4
0
10,510


So fuck me
 

martijn397

Honorable
Apr 16, 2013
13
0
10,520
Thanks for all your reply's buds!

I think the PCI-e 2.0 vs 3.0 did kind justify an upgrade for me allthough im not expecting to solve any issues and/or make a huge difference when i see those benchmarks.

Maybe it will solve my Batman issue if its something else in my setup thats causing this.

Many thanks for your great reply's!

I will do a post about some advice on my upgrade needs sinds else this topic gets a little bit off-topic :)

Again, many thanks!
 


totally
 


This is true. 16 lanes of PCIe 2.0 have the same bandwidth as 8 lanes of PCIe3.

The CPU, not the PCIe bus is barely a bottleneck on the poster's system and primarily at lower resolutions. The PCIe bus on his system is not a bottleneck with any current gen card.