ZYKY,
While I agree with you that the OP's Hardware Monitor "CPUTIN" is a highly suspicious value, it's highly unlikely that it's indicating a VRM, since his rig is at Idle. Nevertheless, just so you understand that I understand, and for the benefit of others who may read this, please allow me elaborate regarding how processor temperatures work:
The signal path for the Analog Thermal Diode originates onboard the processor. Again, this is a thermal diode located in the center of the lower layers of the processor package substrate material,
below the cores. It's not part of the motherboard socket assembly, as it was done with a thermocouple in the socket a decade and a half ago.
The signal travels from the processor pads to socket pins, onto traces on the motherboard to the Super I/O chip. The I/O chip then performs the A to D conversion and outputs the digital value onto the ISA Bus. BIOS then reads the CPU temperature data, applies the appropriate offset correction and writes the new data back onto the ISA Bus.
The Analog Thermal Sensor is completely separate form the Digital Thermal Sensors (DTS) located on the top of each Core at the heat source. Each DTS is comprised of an "array" of guess what ??? ... 8 analog thermal diodes which measure the "hot spots" on an individual Core. The A to D conversion is performed within the DTS package, then a comparator outputs the highest measurement from each Core to the ISA Bus.
Although I agree that motherboard manufacturers do make mistakes with a variety of items including basic signal connections, it's the exception rather than the norm. Mistakes with BIOS coding are far more common, especially lookup tables for CPU temperature. Considering the number of motherboard models, socket types and processor variants, it's not hard to understand. This is why BIOS updates sometimes have fixes which may include "CPU temperature corrections".
So if you really want to get technical, there are a total of
33 Analog Thermal Diodes in an Intel Quad Core; 8 per each DTS, or 32, plus 1 in the substrate that measures overall CPU temperature, which runs 5C cooler than the Cores due to it's relatively distant location from the heat sources. This CPU sensor is intended to "emulate" the thermocouple that Intel embeds in the IHS for lab testing only, and is where the "Tcase" Thermal Specification originates, which is shown in their Processor Spec Finder -
http://ark.intel.com/products/52210/Intel-Core-i5-2500K-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz
Keep in mind that Intel conducts it's lab testing under tightly controlled environmental conditions at 22C, which is "Standard Ambient". As I've pointed out so many times in countless threads, "Tcase" is
NOT Core temperature ... it's CPU temperature, which in a properly calibrated system, runs 5C cooler than "average" Core temperature at a Steady-State 100% workload. Since there are always thermal inaccuracies among Cores, average Core temperature is most important.
This means that for a given variant, simply add 5C to Tcase (CPU temperature) to get a relative Tjunction (Core temperature). This is the temperature at which Intel certifies a processor variant. Tjuntion Max, or Tj Max is, of course, the Thermal Specification at which a processor variant will shutdown.
For the i5 2500K:
Ambient = 22C.
Tcase (CPU Temperature) = 72C.
Tcase to Tjunction Offset + 5C
Tjunction (Core Temperature) = 77C
Tjunction Max (Shutdown Temperature) = 98C
Excessive heat kills electronics. Personally, I believe that any temperatures higher than about 75'ish are just too hot for extended stability testing, day-to-day operations or long term processor health.