So im building a PC to a budget of 630 pounds which equates roughly to 1000 dollars for americans...
Now i know clock for clock Intel is faster per cycle but i wan't to know how this transfers specificly to gaming performence. I.E how noticable is the difference when actually gaming...
I believe on for example a 60 hertz monitor you are limited to 60p frames per second reguardless to how fast the game is running. Would (at 720p) the CPU be the limiting factor for gaming (e.g. BF3)
----------
To summarise hopefully, as a babble whilest writing though i hope that gives you a bit of perspective on my circumstances...
- Is there a significant performence gap between an I5 3570K and FX-8320 (and / or 8350)
- Am i right about monitors?
- As an aside how would intel I5 "P" edition stack up against the AMD FX-8320?
Now i know clock for clock Intel is faster per cycle but i wan't to know how this transfers specificly to gaming performence. I.E how noticable is the difference when actually gaming...
I believe on for example a 60 hertz monitor you are limited to 60p frames per second reguardless to how fast the game is running. Would (at 720p) the CPU be the limiting factor for gaming (e.g. BF3)
----------
To summarise hopefully, as a babble whilest writing though i hope that gives you a bit of perspective on my circumstances...
- Is there a significant performence gap between an I5 3570K and FX-8320 (and / or 8350)
- Am i right about monitors?
- As an aside how would intel I5 "P" edition stack up against the AMD FX-8320?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram