I want to get new gpu but dont know if i should choose nvidia or amd.When i buy it i would stick with it for maybe 3 years before i replace it.
The problem is that when i look at benchmarks of newer game like Crysis 3,Bioshock Infinite,Far Cry 3 and others i see that 2-3 year old Nvidia gpu like gtx 580,480,460 are much better then 6970,5870 and similiar. Why is that? To me looks like a bit older nvidia gpu-s are more "futureproof" then AMD counterpart?
Here are some benchmarks that i found(tom's don't have gpu bench with older gpu-s). Bioshock Infinite- http://www.techspot.com/review/655-bioshock-infinite-performance/page3.html
Crysis 3-http://www.techspot.com/review/642-crysis-3-performance/page4.html
Just look at the gtx 580 how much better is then 6970,or 480 better then 5870,or gtx 460.
The problem is that when i look at benchmarks of newer game like Crysis 3,Bioshock Infinite,Far Cry 3 and others i see that 2-3 year old Nvidia gpu like gtx 580,480,460 are much better then 6970,5870 and similiar. Why is that? To me looks like a bit older nvidia gpu-s are more "futureproof" then AMD counterpart?
Here are some benchmarks that i found(tom's don't have gpu bench with older gpu-s). Bioshock Infinite- http://www.techspot.com/review/655-bioshock-infinite-performance/page3.html
Crysis 3-http://www.techspot.com/review/642-crysis-3-performance/page4.html
Just look at the gtx 580 how much better is then 6970,or 480 better then 5870,or gtx 460.