Which one should i go for it considering that I'm not gonna update my components in less than 2 years , so which one would serve me better for a long time ?
However the FX-6300 was 17% faster than the Core i3-3220 when comparing synthetic performance, 44% faster in the application tests, 30% faster in the encoding benchmarks and just 2% slower when comparing gaming performance. This means that overall the FX-6300 was 22% faster than the Core i3-3220, and given the similarity in pricing this is a good result for AMD.
It's also interesting to compare the 6-core FX-6300 to the similarly price Core i3 3240, but we never tested exactly that one. That is why we are instead comparing it to the slightly more affordable and slower Core i3 3220, which is clocked a 100 MHz less. In this comparison we arrive at an average performance difference of 31.6 percent which is quite a bit. In the multi-threaded benchmarks the differences exceeds 50 percent at times