Core i5-3570k on sale for $169@ Microcenter or Haswell!?

Status
Not open for further replies.

linkgx1

Honorable
Sep 27, 2012
248
0
10,680
I was going to wait for haswell, but that's such a good price plus $40 off the motherboard. Do you guys think it would be a good time to get it? Or should I just be patient and wait.
 
Solution
If you can get the i5-3570k for the same price as the FX8350 and a comparable price on a motherboard. Go ahead and do it.

I doubt you'll see a devils advocate for haswell...(or failwell as some are calling it)...it's only 6-7% gain over Ivy (worse in some benchmarks, actually)...not worth the additional $70 it will cost you over what you could pay for that 3570k right now.

TheMentalist

Distinguished
Haswell has not even arrived yet and those deals are starting to roll. Expect these deals the folowing months. Happens always when a new generation of cpu's arrive. If you really want it go for it, especially with a$40 off mobo.
 

linkgx1

Honorable
Sep 27, 2012
248
0
10,680
I think I might get it. Haswell doesn't seem too much better and I'm pretty sure broadwell will be the last in that chipset even if it makes a big improvement. I'm waiting two years anyways.

Still waiting for the Devil's Advocate though.

But is Haswell basically for tablets and laptops? Because it seems to use less power than anything. That's still good, but when it comes to power on a desktop I don't think it matters as much.
 

linkgx1

Honorable
Sep 27, 2012
248
0
10,680


Yes, yes. Do it! It's like for 3 days only.
 
That's a great deal and past deals are no indication of futures ones... But at the release of the 3570K, Microcenter had it in store for $180 plus $50 off a compatible mobo. I got my combo for a total of $270 plus tax. It's a gamble if you wait and see.
 

8350rocks

Distinguished
If you can get the i5-3570k for the same price as the FX8350 and a comparable price on a motherboard. Go ahead and do it.

I doubt you'll see a devils advocate for haswell...(or failwell as some are calling it)...it's only 6-7% gain over Ivy (worse in some benchmarks, actually)...not worth the additional $70 it will cost you over what you could pay for that 3570k right now.
 
Solution

linkgx1

Honorable
Sep 27, 2012
248
0
10,680
Okay guys, I webt ahead and got the Core i5-3570k and an Asus P8Z77-V LK ATX LGA1155 motherboard. Was this a good choice? It totalled $270, which I ended up just paying $70 out of pocket (plus I got a cathode light!). Thanks guys!
 

redfoot12

Distinguished
Apr 1, 2013
30
2
18,535
I've been wondering about going to Microcenter as well to pick up 3770K for $230. I was originally thinking about waiting for Haswell.
The Micro store cloesest to me is still 100 miles away so I'd have to factor in gas ($50), I guess.
I have everything for my build except for CPU, mobo, and GPU. Any thoughts from the peanut gallery?
 

redfoot12

Distinguished
Apr 1, 2013
30
2
18,535
^Yep. I already reserved it for an in-store pick-up and will be making the trek up there tomorrow. I have all my parts except for my video card. I'm going to wait until the 7xx series is released and see how they affect the high-end GPU market. I'll be using a Radeon 6850 in the meantime.
 

linkgx1

Honorable
Sep 27, 2012
248
0
10,680


That's true. Not only that, I'm hearing rumors of possibly needing a new power supply Haswells and the motherboards will have a premium even if Hascakes doesn't.
 

ericjohn004

Honorable
Oct 26, 2012
651
0
11,010
Personally I would have waited for Haswell. I own a 3570k so don't get me wrong, I love these chips. I like a 3570k a lot more than a 3770k actually, because a 3570k runs about 10-12c cooler, plus it takes less voltage to overclock. I can overclock my 3570k to 4.8Ghz with the same voltage and temps as a 3770k at 4.5Ghz. This results in better frame rates in games than a 3770k and about 10% better single threaded performance while also not being too far being in multithreading(only about 15% slower once you take in to account the .3Ghz overclock advantage). I think the 3570k is actually Intel's flagship, not the 3770k. I actually bought a 3770k to replace my 3570k(because I thought the chip was bad and it ended up just being the RAM) and after I had the 3770k installed and saw the bad temps and high Vcore for my OC I switched to my 3570k and never looked back.

But back to the point, Haswell's theoretical performance in benchmarks like SiSoft Sandra are about 15-25% better than Ivy Bridge. Whereas Ivy Bridges theoretical performance is only about 6-8% better than Sandy's. So that's a huge increase. However in the real world while using single threaded apps, Haswell only has about a 3% performance increase. And in multithreaded software the difference is usually in the 6-8% range. It's almost the EXACT difference between Sandy and Ivy than between Ivy and Haswell. But you never know, that theoretical performance might eventually get taken advantage of by programs.

Ivy bridge also seems to have better memory bandwidth. This could make a difference in apps you depend on loading things into memory. Although Tom's thinks this is because of the fact that the chips are still new. Haswell though, has faster cache and I think Haswell even has something called an L4 cache while Ivy only has L1, L2, and L3. But from my experience, and in benchmarks, cache doesn't make an incredible difference. Only if the cache is a whole lot faster(like comparing Intel's to AMD's cache)will it make a difference.

You were so close to Haswell I would have waited. But I can't blame you, I bought that 3770k just last week. I could have waited for Haswell too but I woulda had to get a new motherboard too.

I'm definitely not upgrading to Haswell, although once it does come out I'll wish I had one just because it's the best. We will have to see how they overclock before we get too excited about them though. Ivy really isn't that hot and Ivy overclocks really well in my experience. I'm able to reach 4.8Ghz with 1.375v while maintaining temps in the mid 80's during Prime95. I'd say that's a good overclock.

So with Haswell, the advantages are:

-15-25% better theoretical performance
-Faster L1, L2, and L3 cache by 25% or more
-A new L4 cache
-3% faster single threaded performance
-6-8% faster multithreaded performance
-35% faster iGPU called the GT2 on K series SKU's(The GT3 and GT3e are over 100% faster but not available on K series)
-Able to overclock through the Base Clock AND Multiplier
-SUPPOSE to be better at overclocking by a little
-SUPPOSE to be cooler at the same voltage and overclock than Ivy
-Comes with new AVX support if I remember correctly which is why it is so much better with theoretical performance

This is all the differences I can think of. IDK about the memory controller. But these improvements seem to be worth the wait to me. Even though 3-8% performance increases don't seem to be huge. It could amount to more once programs start to utilize those AVX instructions. And if it can overclock .2-.3Ghz more than that's another 6-9% performance improvement we could see.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.