High/Ultra Settings on Battlefield 3

Solution
46 fps isnt bad haha, and yes you can play at high with no problem on most everything. and ultra should be attainable if you dont mind 40 fps, which i cant see why you would, but some people think if its less than 60 its not playable.

when i was running a single gtx 660 (exact same one as you linked) and a 2500k, it was running bf3 at an average of 55-60. i dont own bioshock so i cant help there



edit: also OP, notice that the chart above is for 1920x1200, so the numbers will be a little higher at 1080
Turn down settings slightly, or get something a bit more powerful.

FPS_1920.png
 

carowden

Honorable
Jul 11, 2012
891
0
11,160
46 fps isnt bad haha, and yes you can play at high with no problem on most everything. and ultra should be attainable if you dont mind 40 fps, which i cant see why you would, but some people think if its less than 60 its not playable.

when i was running a single gtx 660 (exact same one as you linked) and a 2500k, it was running bf3 at an average of 55-60. i dont own bioshock so i cant help there



edit: also OP, notice that the chart above is for 1920x1200, so the numbers will be a little higher at 1080
 
Solution
Yea, it's x1200, but the difference will be small.

I agree though about under 60fps thing. Myself, I think under 60FPS feels very sluggish.

He can easily turn down a few settings and obtain 60FPS easily without noticeable visual quality, the game looks really good even on medium.
 

carowden

Honorable
Jul 11, 2012
891
0
11,160
i agree about getting 60, it should be easy to do on average at high settings, and maybe even turning a few settings on ultra. i dont think youll get 60fps constantly on ultra with EVERY game out there, but youre gonna be able to play at high