I have a 3570k and I overclocked it to 4.7Ghz with 1.350v on my UD5H motherboard. My temps with my H100i hover around the lower 70's. Which is great for a 4.7Ghz overclock on an Ivy Bridge chip. At 4.5Ghz and 1.250v, my temps are in the low 60's. Some cores are in the 50's.
There's a long reason as to why I did this but I bought a 3770k to replace my 3570k(I thought the chip was bad but it was the RAM). I put the 3770k in and applied the exact same overclock to it as the 3570k at 4.7Ghz. The problem was, the temps were in the high 80's closing in on the 90's. And it's not because I put the cooler on wrong or thermal paste or anything. I redid every thing twice with same results and as soon as I went back to my 3570k I got great temps again.
It took me to go down to 4.5Ghz at 1.250v to get the remotely the same temps as my 3570k at 4.7Ghz with 1.350v, maybe a little worse. So to me, I rather have the 3570k with the great temps and more overclocking capability than having a 3770k and having to look at those high temps every time I check for stability.
My question is: Is a 3770k normally hotter than a 3570k? I would think so, being that the 3770k has 8 threads. But I wasn't expecting the difference to be 12-13c like it was. I was expecting a 3-5c difference. Maybe 7-8c at the most.
So did I just get a bad chip? I'll be returning it anyways since my 3570k ended up not being the problem. And to me, I rather have a 3570k running a 4.8Ghz than a 3770k running at 4.5Ghz with the same temps. The 3570k will be better for gaming with the higher clocks anyways.
So if it is that I just got a bad chip. Then this means that no two processors can be compared to one and other. You can't ask "Is this overclock good or normal?" or "Are my temps good for this voltage with this cooler?". Because you won't have consistent numbers between two processors of the same kind.
Any insight on this will be appreciated.
There's a long reason as to why I did this but I bought a 3770k to replace my 3570k(I thought the chip was bad but it was the RAM). I put the 3770k in and applied the exact same overclock to it as the 3570k at 4.7Ghz. The problem was, the temps were in the high 80's closing in on the 90's. And it's not because I put the cooler on wrong or thermal paste or anything. I redid every thing twice with same results and as soon as I went back to my 3570k I got great temps again.
It took me to go down to 4.5Ghz at 1.250v to get the remotely the same temps as my 3570k at 4.7Ghz with 1.350v, maybe a little worse. So to me, I rather have the 3570k with the great temps and more overclocking capability than having a 3770k and having to look at those high temps every time I check for stability.
My question is: Is a 3770k normally hotter than a 3570k? I would think so, being that the 3770k has 8 threads. But I wasn't expecting the difference to be 12-13c like it was. I was expecting a 3-5c difference. Maybe 7-8c at the most.
So did I just get a bad chip? I'll be returning it anyways since my 3570k ended up not being the problem. And to me, I rather have a 3570k running a 4.8Ghz than a 3770k running at 4.5Ghz with the same temps. The 3570k will be better for gaming with the higher clocks anyways.
So if it is that I just got a bad chip. Then this means that no two processors can be compared to one and other. You can't ask "Is this overclock good or normal?" or "Are my temps good for this voltage with this cooler?". Because you won't have consistent numbers between two processors of the same kind.
Any insight on this will be appreciated.