It sounds like 8 is a little like Vista when it comes to including more (to many IMO) Permissions.
Permissions are one of the main reasons I skipped Vista and may be the reason I skip 8, although I haven't made up my mind yet.
Prohibitive permissions are IMO something the Owner/Administrator should have the ability to enable but, I don't like it when they are all enabled by default and you have to jump through all kinds of hoops to use your OS the way you want to.
I can't stand UAC in windows 7 and I do (and always will) run with it disabled. I use a good anti-virus, malware, rootkit, spyware software and I keep complete offline back ups in case they are necessary, as well as using Acronis "try and decide" if I am engaging in what I consider particularly risky behavior.
I have never had to use my back up because of a virus, malware etc. and my Acronis "try and decide" hasn't proved to be necessary (yet) for the same reasons.
So although I like to be safe, I can't stand an OS that I own always second guessing my actions. If I didn't really want to make a particular choice, I wouldn't have made it in the first place.
To me it's equivalent to turning the steering wheel of a car you own to the left and having the car ask "are you sure you want to turn left" or "Do you want to allow this car to make a left hand turn down an unknown road". Simply unacceptable!
So, my question is, considering what I've written Do you think I would find 8 more restrictive/annoying than 7 or less?
Permissions are one of the main reasons I skipped Vista and may be the reason I skip 8, although I haven't made up my mind yet.
Prohibitive permissions are IMO something the Owner/Administrator should have the ability to enable but, I don't like it when they are all enabled by default and you have to jump through all kinds of hoops to use your OS the way you want to.
I can't stand UAC in windows 7 and I do (and always will) run with it disabled. I use a good anti-virus, malware, rootkit, spyware software and I keep complete offline back ups in case they are necessary, as well as using Acronis "try and decide" if I am engaging in what I consider particularly risky behavior.
I have never had to use my back up because of a virus, malware etc. and my Acronis "try and decide" hasn't proved to be necessary (yet) for the same reasons.
So although I like to be safe, I can't stand an OS that I own always second guessing my actions. If I didn't really want to make a particular choice, I wouldn't have made it in the first place.
To me it's equivalent to turning the steering wheel of a car you own to the left and having the car ask "are you sure you want to turn left" or "Do you want to allow this car to make a left hand turn down an unknown road". Simply unacceptable!
So, my question is, considering what I've written Do you think I would find 8 more restrictive/annoying than 7 or less?