amacher2772 :
unoriginal1 :
amacher2772 :
unoriginal1 :
amacher2772 :
unoriginal1 :
Depends on the game. But as mentioned above you'll notice very small to no differences.
PCI-E 2.0 vs 3.0 makes the biggest differences when you have larger Sli and Crossfire set ups.
Thanks for the help, I forgot to mention, I only plan on playing Skyrim and the Bioshock series.
Skyrim there is about a 9% difference between 2.0 and 3.0. So your looking at about a 6 fps difference.
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/07/18/pci_express_20_vs_30_gpu_gaming_performance_review/13#.UZ5HHpz09I0
Again.. All games will be different but with a single GPU they will relatively be like this... Small fps gain, or close to the same. Only when you have 2-3-4 gpus at the same time. Will you start to see the huge leaps in fps with 3.0 vs 2.0.
That link is very interesting, thanks for that. I am assuming 6fps are not worth switching over to an intel processor and motherboard.
Well the 6 fps really have nothing to do with the Proc/Mobo combination. Amd is a good budget chip, but overall Intels 3570k is hands down the best gaming chip available. (haswell coming soon)
That changes everything really.. Some games are CPU intensive like WoW, I believe Skyrim is too but I could be wrong as I haven't looked for the info. But if you can afford it you might want to consider switching to Intel if you haven't bought everything already.
NOT SAYING amd can't do the job. They still have some quality products and I recommend them for budget builds. But all fanboyism aside.. Intel beats Amd when it comes to gaming hands down.
*edit* What I showed you above was strictly just a comparison of the 2.0 PCI-E Speeds versus the newer 3.0 speeds.
Gotcha. So you recommend the 3570k. The price is 225$ and I was going to buy the AMD 8 core for 200$. So I might be persuaded depending on how much a motherboard costs. I am on a budget of 1000$ give or take. I haven't bought anything yet so anything can happen now haha. My cousin has the same AMD processor and runs Skyrim Flawless. But he uses SLI GTX 550 ti's. I don't know enough about such matters so maybe I will go with intel. Since Haswell is coming out maybe the i5's will go on sale or drop in price!
Everyone thinks every time the price in CPUS will drop when the next gen comes out. Unfortunately... It never happens lol Ive seen generation after generation come out and the prices stay basically the same.
If your wanting to build right now. I'd say the 3570k and overclock it. You'll destroy your friends machine as far as CPU power goes.. Since he has sli 550's that's going to give him an edge when it comes to GPU power. But for a 1k budget you can get an awesome machine.
If your willing to wait a little bit then I'd go with haswell. It will be a new socket, new mobos and give about 5-10% more power. (not much.. but it's a new technology).
In gaming there's a few things to remember. Virtual cors or htt (hyper threading) Do nothing to help you. The games aren't designed (I believe there is only 1 title) to take advantage of them and it doesn't look like the trend will change. So things like the i7 with 4 cors 4 virtual doesn't help. Same is said for AMDS 8 cor proc. So stick to the i5. Best bang for your buck.
Check out this link. Here in Skyrim they get avg fps of 74 with the 660 ti at 1080 res. Has the benchmarks for other cards too. They used an i7 in their testing but the i5 3570k is going to give similar performance.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-660-ti-benchmark-review,3279-9.html
Here the 3570k (3.4ghz) gets 87 fps on Ultra versus the amd fx 8350 (4.0 ghz) gets 67 So you can see even the clock speed (ghz) Doesn't really match up. Intel is just faster.. On things like rendering or applications that take full advantage of hyper threading AMD can come out on top.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/356772-28-intel-3570k-8350
You'll need to scroll down a bit to find the benchmarks for the i5 vs amd. About mid page.