Did you guys see this? Just popped up on my feed.
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/382267/intel-haswell-hotter-and-slower-than-expected
Seems that the retail versions are running hotter and unable to overclock as well as the demo parts.
Well I have a 2600K and I know that 5.0 Ghz was never guaranteed, but with better cooling I always felt I could get close. I always feel I have headroom but 4.5 Ghz is more than enough for me. It runs 24/7 on a H100 mind you.
Is it possible that the Intel guys tried hiding how badly the new line overclocks and sent our pre binned/verified parts?
What about those first few reports which said that these chips are a breeze to OC?
If Intel did do this on purpose, its pretty disappointing. Just my two cents here.
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/382267/intel-haswell-hotter-and-slower-than-expected
Seems that the retail versions are running hotter and unable to overclock as well as the demo parts.
Well I have a 2600K and I know that 5.0 Ghz was never guaranteed, but with better cooling I always felt I could get close. I always feel I have headroom but 4.5 Ghz is more than enough for me. It runs 24/7 on a H100 mind you.
Is it possible that the Intel guys tried hiding how badly the new line overclocks and sent our pre binned/verified parts?
What about those first few reports which said that these chips are a breeze to OC?
If Intel did do this on purpose, its pretty disappointing. Just my two cents here.