hafijur :
Its web surfing not idle, 4 hour battery life to 8 hours 24 minutes on web surfing which most people do from one generation on same laptop design is amazing. Haswell is probably the next big thing, its revolutionary in innovation and you amd fanboy troll it, for sure amd will take till 2017 to get close to haswell efficiency wise. Intels igpu is on 22nm no other manufacturer has a lower nm gpu, also iris pro hd 5200 competes against 650m while sipping a lot less power. So yes intel are generations ahead.
I can see you now 5 years on from now saying look a 125w cpu now beats a 10w intel cpu. AMD really need to improve 3x in cpu terms performance per watt by next year and we all know thats very unlikely.
Intel will win so many awards with haswell and design wins that amd might as well not bother making laptop cpus except entry level as theres no real point as no one will buy it as its so far behind.
Do you not understand over double the battery life on web browsing while both are on 22nm cpu only haswell has a 32nm pch motherboard but even then its sensational. Not only that the iris igpu beats any amd apu gpu there is. To the op I don't see any amd cpu beating or competing against the 3570k unless they improve 2 or 4 core threaded performance in the near future. Its quite funny my i5 3317u is close to 2x faster then an fx8350 on single threaded performance and mine sips 1/10th of the electricity.
This guy.
How much does Intel pay you?
First of all who in the right mind that is serious about wanting to game on PC would do it on a laptop?
Haswell has done very little to improve on anything for desktops.
You want to talk about wattages and efficiency and are praising Intel up and down now but lets take a trip back to 2010 when the first generation i series processors came out.
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/298/AMD_Athlon_II_X4_615e_vs_Intel_Core_i3_i3-530.html
Hmm so the i3 was a dual core that had a tdp of 72 watts while the Athlon X4 is a true quad with a TdP of 45W and came out about the same time.
Hmm, interesting.
If you think it is because of the CPU frequency just look at the i5's running about the same speed as the X4,
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Core_i5/Intel-Core%20i5-750S%20BV80605003213AH%20(BX80605I5750S).html
Almost double the wattage for the same performance according to these sketchy benchmarks.
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-750-vs-AMD-Athlon-II-X4-615e
Don't know if CPU boss is a good benchmarker but that is comparing the faster 2.66GHz 750 to the X4.
So AMD out did Intel in 2010 with the wattages and performance what is to say they can't do it again?
Show me one legitimate benchmark where the i5 beats the 8350.
Because this is what I get,
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-3317U-vs-AMD-FX-8350
Yup, the i5 is close but AMD really messed up with the FX series and there was no way to fix it without changing the die I believe.
Correct me if I am wrong.
So AMD has stopped upgrading the FX series about a year ago.