Is a 27" so big that the spaces between pixels becomes annoying?

gary king

Honorable
Mar 5, 2013
138
0
10,680
I'm currently using a 21.5" monitor, at 1920x1080 resolution. I feel that the items on the screen are too small (such as buttons, etc.), so I want to get a bigger monitor. I was originally going to get a 24", but now I'm thinking of going to 27", and still keeping the 1920x1080 resolution.

However, I heard that the spaces between pixels become noticeable. How annoying exactly is this? Right now for instance, the pixels are so packed on my 21.5" monitor that there are no "spaces". However, I also have a 50" HDTV and although I can notice the spaces for 1080p and 720p television programming, I feel that it isn't THAT bad. But perhaps it's much worse when the screen is two feet in front of my face and I have to read text on it? My monitor is currently 24" from my eyes, and with the new monitor, I plan on it being 24–26" from my eyes.

Will the spaces between pixels be most problematic for graphics such as video games and movies, or reading text? Ideally, I want a monitor that can read text crisp and clear (otherwise I'll probably get a headache), but if graphics doesn't look as great because it's blown up on a 27" monitor, then that isn't as big of a problem for me.

Also, will a 27" monitor be so large when it's 24" from my eyes that it will strain my neck because I have to move it too much to see the whole thing?
 

gary king

Honorable
Mar 5, 2013
138
0
10,680


Yeah I doubt I will be going to 1440p because I don't think my system would be able to handle it. I'm actually planning on building a $900 gaming PC, and theoretically it should be able to run games like Crysis 3 on all max settings at 60 FPS or so at 1080p, so I think I'll leave it at that. Also, 1440p requires a monitor that can support it. Those are $100–200 more expensive than the ones that don't support it. So I think the costs would add up fast. I am fine with 1080p at the moment, mainly because my budget can't handle any more.
 
No. The space BETWEEN pixels is never noticeable on modern monitors no matter the resolution because they just use larger pixels for low density screens. TVs are different (especially at 50+ inches) because you can only make your pixels so large before you need to space them out a bit. As the pixels on the screen are a fixed position there is literally no difference between 720p or 1080p content as far as space between pixels because your output device or monitor will upscale or stretch the image in order to use all available pixels. This may cause other distortion or clarity issues, but it is not going to introduce empty space between the pixels.

HOWEVER, there are other issues with owning a large low res screen! I own a 28" 1920x1200 monitor and the issue is that the pixels are so huge that no amount of anti-aliasing is ever going to make issues like stair-stepping go away. Textures on objects look blurry compared to smaller monitors. Text is nice and big, but chunky. In general, it is fine if you sit back away ~4 feet from the screen, but if you are a normal user who sits less than 3' from your monitor then I would advise against it.

If you are getting a monitor in the 26-30" range then I would highly suggest a QHD 1440p screen so that these issues are not a problem. If you want a monitor in the 30+" range (waiting for a 35-40" monitor myself) then you really need to wait for 4K to come out in order to reduce pixel issues.
 

Futurama_Firefly

Honorable
Jun 9, 2013
15
0
10,510
Can you borrow a monitor for a while or perhaps game or work on a computer with at 27" monitor? That would be ideal as this is highly subjective. Try it yourself.

As an example how subjective it will be: I sit on both an iMac 27" and a PC with a Samsung SyncMaster 27" S27B350. I use the iMac for work and the PC with the Samsung for gaming. I have neither a problem moving my eyes across the screen (without moving my neck) on the Samsung. I mainly game and do entertainment stuff on the Samsung and I have little issue with the pixel space. I have 20/20 vision and I sit approximately 60cm or (24") myself from the monitor.
 


The move between 1080p and 1440p is a HUGE leap in clarity, and a $1-200 difference is not a big deal compared to the advantages you get for it. If you are really into gaming then you will be upgrading your GPU every 2-5 years, and your core system every 5-7 years, but your monitor can easily last 10+ years so it is well worth the money to get a monitor that you enjoy looking at, and may even be a bit beyond the rest of your system now because you are going to stare at that thing for a very long time.

If you are going to skimp on parts then get a more basic (but reliable) motherbaord, or a non-K CPU, or even value ram, because those things are easy and relatively cheap to replace down the road. It has been shown that it is much cheaper in the long run to get cheap $150-200 GPUs and trade up every year than to get a mid to high level card every 3-5 years (because you retain resale value better in 1 year time on a cheap card than in 3-5 year's time on a high end card).
But things like your monitor, keys, mice, power supply, and cables can last for many computer builds, and it is often much cheaper to get slightly more expensive high end parts that are going to last a while, than to go through several cheap ones every few years. As an example, my last monitor was a CRT monitor from the late '80s. I got it used from my dad's work, and it was a beautiful 21" CRT. I did not replace that thing until 5 years ago when I finally got my 28" flat panel monitor, but as much as I wanted a higher resolution and quality screen, the simple fact was that they cost $1500 at the time which was WAY out of my price range. But now you can find those 1440p monitors for $200 more than a 'standard' 1080p resolution monitor, which in the long game makes a whole lot of sense. What is really going to make you kick yourself is that ~1 year from now 4K monitors are going to be readily available, which is going to make the price of 1440p and large 1080p screens drop like a rock, so if nothing else I would highly suggest getting a cheap small screen in the mean time, or reuse an old screen for a little bit. Then, a few months after 4K takes hold and prices start doping then you can spend your money on a high quality monitor that will last you a good long time.

Like I said, the same goes for things like keybaords. On my first build I went through several sets of cheap keyboards in 2 years time. Then I bought a good quality Logitech set, and that lasted me 11 years, and would have lasted longer if my son had not pushed it off the desk onto the concrete floor. I am not saying that you need to buy something ridiculous. Just something a little above average.

For some items it pays to spend a little more, while for others it does not. Monitors are worth every penny you can throw at them.
 

gary king

Honorable
Mar 5, 2013
138
0
10,680


Ah yeah my mistake. I'm actually getting a GTX 660 so I suspect the FPS will be more like 25–30. So, I definitely would not be able to play on a 1440p monitor.
 

gary king

Honorable
Mar 5, 2013
138
0
10,680


Okay thanks, that really gives me a lot to think about. Right now, the truth is, I'm actually using a 21.5" iMac. I plan on selling it, then buying a Mac Mini and using a KVM switch with a gaming PC I'm going to build. The Mac Mini will have an SSD, so I plan on keeping it for at least five years unchanged (it'll also be an i7 and have 16 GB of RAM), and the PC will have a GTX 660 and hopefully basically just need a new GPU in three years or so.
 

phil_livesey

Honorable
Nov 3, 2012
181
0
10,710
Me and all my friends agree that for most things, a 24" 1080p monitor is big enough. They also agree that anything bigger needs to be a higher resolution.

I have 2 24" monitors about 2 feet away from me and they're ideal.
 

gary king

Honorable
Mar 5, 2013
138
0
10,680


Excellent thanks.

After taking everything into consideration, I think I'll be getting a 24" monitor. It'll cost about $200. I checked prices for 27" monitors; they are about $275, which isn't bad, but if I want a native resolution of 2560x1440, that will cost about $500. And I need a good GPU just to support it. I think 24" is the sweet spot for now.

And yes, in reply to one of the commenters, monitors definitely last a long time. I have at least half a dozen monitors in my house right (all except for one in use), which have been passed down the computer generations, so it's always good to spend a little bit of extra money there.
 

Astralv

Distinguished
I have 2 monitors set up, both 27". I had every size of monitors from 15" to 27". I love 27". I have no issues with both of them. One is Dell S2740L- great monitor. Sharp with great details, no distortion or blur- the only issue is- it glass, reflects light and I can see myself in it. The other one is LG- works fine, not as great as Dell, but no reflection issues. No space between pixels.
 

gary king

Honorable
Mar 5, 2013
138
0
10,680


How far from the monitors are your eyes? Are you able to see the whole monitor without moving your head too much, and do your eyes get tired after a while from moving from one end of the monitors to the other?
 

Astralv

Distinguished
Ha ha- it is not that big! lol. I am here 18 hours a day, it is half way across my desk from me- pretty close. If you have dark room and not afraid of your reflection in the dark (lol), try Dell model I posted. (I had deal about $269, but you have to call them and ask for it). LG that I have is pretty good as well, but only at1920x1080 resolution. I have Acer on it's way should be here any day now- I paid $200, can let you know quality as soon as it arrives. But- 27 is fine. No problems. Love it. Eyes feel better than with 23".