Not sure what to upgrade to

finngrace

Honorable
Jun 9, 2013
25
0
10,540
I am currently looking for advice regarding an upgrade for a multi-monitor setup. For starters, here's my current system specs, and some copypasta from the sub-forum thread :


APPROXIMATE PURCHASE DATE: Feb 2014
USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Gaming at 5670*1080 at highest settings possible (Crysis 3, Assassin's Creed III, Metro: Last Light, etc)
CPU: AMD FX-8350
RAM: 2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance LP 1600MHz
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
SSD: 2x Intel 520 120GB
GPU: 2x MSI Nvidia GTX 660 Ti Power Edition in SLI
PSU: Corsair AX860i

I am currently running an Nvidia Surround setup using 3 Dell S2340M monitors rated at 1920*1080 totaling up to a resolution of 5670*1080. I'm currently having no noticeable performance issues whatsoever when running my games at high settings, however am having issues running them at maximum settings using the highest available AA and texture settings.

My main issue is that I'm a big PhysX fanboy, and have loved the tech since Ageia created it, so I need something that would be able to crunch the data and give me acceptable framerates all using three monitors in unison.

I have researched my issue and have found that it is due to my GTX 660 Ti's memory bus which is a 192-bit bus, effectively stopping the point of my SLI setup.

What I have been looking at are 3 different options.

1) GTX Titan; this is due to the ever so large bus width, a 384-bit bus, coupled with an obscene amount of video memory at 6GB to handle all the textures. The only issue with this is the fact of availability. I like that the power consumption is rated at 250W, which is currently lower compared to my GTX 660 Ti SLI setup.

2) GTX 780; this is an alternate option in the case that the GTX Titan is not worth the money, and I've heard in most cases, that it is not. The only thing I fear is that it might not work well by itself when put to work with a tri-monitor setup due to the lower amount of memory, at 3GB, of which I hope that 3rd party manufacturers will at least throw in a 4GB or 6GB model to combat that issue.

3) 2x GTX 770; this would be the last choice in my selection of cards due to the price-point scenario, where two of these cards would run faster than a GTX 780, and almost comparably with a GTX Titan, however with a much higher power ceiling (at about 460W), but will also support superior PhysX calculation compared to the other two options.

Which should I get, or should I wait for Maxwell?
 

Northwolfe

Distinguished
Jul 18, 2008
92
0
18,640
I would go for the Titan (personally have three, not in SLI, but on different computers). That card is a beast, and will only get better as future next gen games take more advantage of the memory, and bandwidth available.
The other two options are also very good solutions, but if you have the funds, the Titan is the Titan.
The 780 is almost as good as the Titan, in real world scenarios, and you probably will not notice any difference in gaming. The same cannot be said for content production, where those seconds the Titan gains quickly become minutes, and hours. I seriously doubt the card will receive more memory, since the price point is already too close to the Titan. If you just game, the 780 is probably your best buy.
As for the 770s, I have 4 EVGA's ordered at Amazon (SLI on two PCs)...Because of the raw power they posses. In most real world scenarios they will obliterate both the 780, and the Titan. Only issue is Power, and Heat.
Titan, money not being an issue. 780, if you're on a budget (not that the difference is that great).
Cheers.
 

bumnut53

Distinguished
Sep 19, 2011
870
0
19,160
If you can afford a Titan why not get 2 780's? It will destroy a Titan for not that much extra cash.

Don't get 2 770's as they only have 2 GB RAM which is not enough for multi monitor gaming with eyecandy on.
 

jinayhvora

Honorable


u can get the 4GB 770
 

Northwolfe

Distinguished
Jul 18, 2008
92
0
18,640


Yes, you are right. That solution totally escaped my mind. There is however two drawbacks to such a system:
- The power issues the OP referred as being essential.
- The price of the Titan has been a bit shaved, and the difference is no longer very big. 2x780 for around $1300/ Titan for around $950/$1000.
If he can live with the increased power demands, your solution is definitely the best.
 

finngrace

Honorable
Jun 9, 2013
25
0
10,540
The unfortunate bit is that I can afford to get either solutions, however the power draw is what I can't stand. Having to draw essentially 200W more power is a deal-breaker for me. At this point, I'm stuck between getting either the GTX Titan or the GTX 780. Both having the same power draw, bus width and bandwidth, either of the two could probably handle tri-monitor gaming better than any SLI setup between the three cards while functioning under lower power requirements.

Now honestly, which to choose for hardcore gaming on three monitors with the lowest possible power draw with minimal impact on performance is what I'm getting at.

At this point, it's a draw between the GTX Titan and the GTX 780, but with a bias leaning towards the GTX Titan.

Any thoughts before I set my mind to either of them?
 

Northwolfe

Distinguished
Jul 18, 2008
92
0
18,640


All things considered, I generally prefer a single powerful card, over SLI. Like I said, if power is an issue (guessing the energy pull to the place where you have the PC is already near capacity) go for the Titan. If you can afford it, it's a no brainer. I don't game with three monitors (because I don't like the experience), but a Titan has no problems with three monitors in content creation (CAD/Rendering/Virtual Machine/Video editing).
You can't go wrong with the Titan, so that's what I would buy...It's not just a GPU, it's an engineering masterpiece.
GTX Titan :)