SSD for early 2008 MacBook?

SyntaxSocialist

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2013
153
0
18,690
So I'm upgrading/maxing out the capacities of my early 2008 MacBook. Replacing a long-defunct optical drive, doubling the RAM, upgrading to the highest supported OS X version, and otherwise just doing a nice cleaning, both physically and digitally (probably going to do a full formatting of the HDD, do a clean re-install, and restore all my documents from backup.

If I were to get an SSD, I wouldn't pull the trigger until after I had everything running smoothly once again (the thing is in pieces at the moment), since SSDs are a bit of an investment. For the same reason, I'd probably buy around Black Friday or something like that to snag a deal. I don't mind waiting.

My question, though, is this: I would imagine that an '08 MacBook would have been built with SATA2 (3Gb/s) connections. Will an SSD still benefit the system? I just don't want to buy an SSD and then bottleneck it... What a waste.

EDIT: Can anyone elaborate on the technical side of this? I want to know if my reasoning is sound on the "how" of it:

Let's assume I have a 7200rpm HDD right now (I need to double-check). As per the 2010 standard (roughly the vintage of my HDD), my current maximum throughput would be around 1.00 Gb/sec (1,030 Mb/s; Wikipedia). SATA2, having a maximum bandwidth of 3.0Gb/s, would not use the full potential of, say, a Samsung 840, which has a maximum write speed of 530MB/s (4.14Gb/s), but would still theoretically triple my maximum throughput when it caps out at 3.0Gb/s.

Yes?
 
Solution
A SSD is a great upgrade, your system will feel much more responsive.
I can recommend Samsung SSDs, the 840 works fine in my machine and should be sufficient for your MacBook.

corbeau

Honorable
Jan 24, 2013
153
0
10,710
It will still be a good improvement. I'm using an ssd in my dell from 2009 (dual core Penryn clocked at 2.0ghz) which is SATA II and it boots in under 30 seconds (it used to take at least 3x that with a standard HDD).
 

SyntaxSocialist

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2013
153
0
18,690
Cool! Thanks all!

I was looking into upgrading the CPU, but it's soldered to the board, and a new board would be ~$200 minimum for only a couple MHz improvement. I'm using the CPU a lot less intensively these days (no more gaming; I built a desktop). Really, it's just for internet browsing, watching videos away from my TV/ or desktop, and mobile work like word processing now.

Can anyone elaborate on the technical side of this, though? I want to know if my reasoning is sound on the "how" of it:

Let's assume I have a 7200rpm HDD right now (I need to double-check). As per the 2010 standard (roughly the vintage of my HDD), my current maximum throughput would be around 1.00 Gb/sec (1,030 Mb/s; Wikipedia). SATA2, having a maximum bandwidth of 3.0Gb/s, would not use the full potential of, say, a Samsung 840, which has a maximum write speed of 530MB/s (4.14Gb/s), but would still theoretically triple my maximum throughput when it caps out at 3.0Gb/s.

Yes?

EDIT: turns out it's a 5400 rpm using a SATA1 interface to connect to the motherboard's SATA2 port. Sure looks like an SSD would do a lot for me...