So if I got it right:
NVidia: converts 2D games into 3D by creating 2x60Hz images that are registered by the 3d vision kit glasses and seen as 3D by your brain. For this, you do not need a 3D monitor, only a 120Hz.
ATI : basically/simply uses software to make your pc (and graphics card) able to use the 3D function of your monitor. (So NVidia GPUs won’t be able to create a 3D image from a 60hz 3D monitor, right?)
And doesn’t only ATI support 3D games? Are games even 3D or not 3D? (in other words, what’s the difference between ‘Ati’s 3d games and NVidia’s 3d games’)
Also, in the end, what do you pay for each (keeping in mind a 3D monitor costs 300+$ +software cost and the NVidia kit 130$) and how do they compare?
NVidia: converts 2D games into 3D by creating 2x60Hz images that are registered by the 3d vision kit glasses and seen as 3D by your brain. For this, you do not need a 3D monitor, only a 120Hz.
ATI : basically/simply uses software to make your pc (and graphics card) able to use the 3D function of your monitor. (So NVidia GPUs won’t be able to create a 3D image from a 60hz 3D monitor, right?)
And doesn’t only ATI support 3D games? Are games even 3D or not 3D? (in other words, what’s the difference between ‘Ati’s 3d games and NVidia’s 3d games’)
Also, in the end, what do you pay for each (keeping in mind a 3D monitor costs 300+$ +software cost and the NVidia kit 130$) and how do they compare?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram