reading this thread, ive decided to chime in.. well first someone said you have better movement with mouse and keyboard.. im thinking how is WASD, plus shift to sprint and another button to walk slower than full speed going to offer more precise, or better movement than a thumbstick?.. omnidirectional movement of varying speeds all done with a single thumb.. not 4-5 fingers
another person said the analog stick was push and wait but the mouse was instant from point A to point B.. in order for this to even be possible, your hand would have to be able to go instantaneously from point A to point B and unless you have some means of teleporting body parts without the use of muscles, a mouse will never go point A to point B.. your muscles pull on your hand until you get your hand to where you want to go, so thats a push and wait as well
as for mouse+keyboard vs controller, the biggest let down for mouse + keyboard is that keyboard, you need atleast 4 keys for movement alone and its clumsy 8-way only movement that youre either standing still or moving full speed.. so if the mouse was a bit more precise than thumbstick id still rather have two analog devices over one for general gameplay, even if it meant taking a small hit on precision
now.. about that precision, ive been playing battlefield 4 demo a lot lately, and ive been going back and forth between my PS3 controller and a mouse with a PS3 navigation nunchuck thingie which gives me omnidirectional movement with a thumbstick in the left hand, plus a total of 10 buttons.. with the mouse in the right
what ive discovered is this.. the mouse is easier and quicker to learn, but due to my experience with the thumbstick, which is a lot of thumbstick use, meaning i have a level of control and precision most keyboard/mouse people just dont have.. i really didnt see much difference in precision, the mouse however did make navigating menus a lot easier, and the scroll wheel allowed me to do some interesting things.. but i did not see enough of a difference in precision for me to drop my PS3 controller and start worshipping the mouse+keyboard gods
now people may tell me im missing a ton of buttons using and kind of controller vs a keyboard.. but i dont think so, how many keys do you actually use? and a controller has 16, 17 keys if you count the PS button, my D-pad gets mapped to 8 different functions with xpadder, so thats actually 21 buttons and with just a single set-switch button via xpadder, where holding this button converts all other buttons into a single function, it doubles my button count to about 40.. typically reserving the 8 d-pad buttons to hot-key items
so my question is this.. how many keys do you actually use or need for most PC games?.. considering most games with keyboard just use a different button for every little function (such as one button to crouch, one to go prone, another to stand.. which can all be mapped to one).. i find it difficult to believe a controller cant provide all the buttons neccessary.. in fact, my proof of this is the fact i play arma 3 with everything mapped to the controller in a very intuitive, easy to use fashion
my second question.. how much aiming precision do you really need?.. is it worth sacrificing omnidirectional variable speed movement, your ability to run, jump and dodge as well, or your abilities to better control vehicles or fly aircraft for that minute increase of precision (for mouse users it would be a much, much larger increase in precision using a mouse, but not those of us experienced with a thumbstick, the difference is much less)?
to answer my question, i find the controller to be much more balanced, much more comfortable, much more intuitive, and i really dont feel like im missing out on anything when using it.. and i enjoy the more relaxed, more comfortable means of playing games, not having to have a chair pushed up to a desk or both hands on the table.. i can sit back in a recliner with a controller in my lap and let hand-eye coordination do the rest