Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Cheapest CPU for either the GTX 760 or GTX 660?

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
June 30, 2013 7:01:54 PM

I've been working on the specs for my new PC for a month now (slowly, over time; I'm in no hurry). Originally my plan was to get a i3-3220 and GTX 660, because the GTX 660 is the most expensive GPU I can afford, while the i3-3220 is among the cheapest CPUs that still should not bottleneck this GPU.

However since then, the GTX 760 has come out. Since it's about $60 more expensive but has very impressive specs, I've been thinking of getting that instead. But, I feel that the i3-3220 might bottleneck it. Is that the case? If so, then what CPU should I get instead that's still cheap? Any of the higher-level i3's, or low-end i5's?

This is for a purely gaming PC; it's not used for anything else. Which is why I plan on putting most of the money in the GPU rather than the CPU. Also, out of the benchmarks that I've browsed over the past weeks, I noticed that the Intel CPUs actually performed admirably better than the AMD CPUs of similar prices, especially since a lot of games are still not able to take advantage of the quad cores that AMD often offers at low pricepoints.
a b à CPUs
June 30, 2013 7:08:03 PM

the gtx 760 is close to a gtx 670 and an i3 would indeed bottleneck it. honestly to reach a 760's full potential you need a quadcore from intel, or an octacore from AMD's FX line. I would go for either fx8350 or something like the i5 4570
m
0
l

Best solution

a b à CPUs
June 30, 2013 7:12:35 PM

Personally, if it was me, I would use the extra money for a quad core i5 (something inexpensive like the 3350P) and then grab the GTX 660. Although to be more honest, I''ll spend a little out of budget and grab both an i5 and the GTX 760. I still think it's the better move to purchase a good quad core CPU so that it'll give me some more headroom for a GPU upgrade later. This is my opinion though, I know not a lot of people would agree with me.
Share
Related resources
a b à CPUs
June 30, 2013 7:13:46 PM

If you're looking for a cheap solution to team up with your 760/660, I'd suggest a FX4350 from AMD. Pricing is close to Intel's i3 3220, but with higher gaming performance in new titles that can take advantage of quad-core CPUs.
m
0
l
a c 120 å Intel
a c 992 à CPUs
June 30, 2013 7:21:06 PM

+1 ^
m
1
l
June 30, 2013 7:29:29 PM

Okay thanks for the responses guys. I guess at the very least I should aim for a quad core CPU rather than stick with the dual core i3's? At the moment, as I said, in benchmarks the dual core Intels perform about the same or better than the quad core AMDs, but for the near future I imagine that new games will take better advantage of quad core AMD CPUs?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
June 30, 2013 7:43:51 PM

Yes, new games will take advantage of even 8 core CPUs in the future. Yet Intel only give 4 cores at max for desktop environment.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
June 30, 2013 9:18:12 PM

Madn3ss795 said:
Yes, new games will take advantage of even 8 core CPUs in the future. Yet Intel only give 4 cores at max for desktop environment.


I wouldn't conclude it just yet. If I were to go 6-8 core for gaming, I'd wait for games for the next gen consoles
to come out to the PC before I draw that conclusion. Then we'll see whether more cores play a huge role for gaming.
m
0
l
July 15, 2013 8:54:58 AM

vmem said:
the gtx 760 is close to a gtx 670 and an i3 would indeed bottleneck it. honestly to reach a 760's full potential you need a quadcore from intel, or an octacore from AMD's FX line. I would go for either fx8350 or something like the i5 4570


Do you think I could use an AMD A8 5600k Black Edition with a gtx 760, its a quad-core
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
July 15, 2013 5:54:21 PM

BoSoxFan98 said:
vmem said:
the gtx 760 is close to a gtx 670 and an i3 would indeed bottleneck it. honestly to reach a 760's full potential you need a quadcore from intel, or an octacore from AMD's FX line. I would go for either fx8350 or something like the i5 4570


Do you think I could use an AMD A8 5600k Black Edition with a gtx 760, its a quad-core


Don't, since 1/3 the price of the 5600k is for the IGP ( HD7560D ), which you won't use any at all. Plus FM2 is becoming a dead socket soon.
m
0
l
July 15, 2013 6:22:16 PM

EzioAs said:
Personally, if it was me, I would use the extra money for a quad core i5 (something inexpensive like the 3350P) and then grab the GTX 660. Although to be more honest, I''ll spend a little out of budget and grab both an i5 and the GTX 760. I still think it's the better move to purchase a good quad core CPU so that it'll give me some more headroom for a GPU upgrade later. This is my opinion though, I know not a lot of people would agree with me.


Well i agree... It makes your gaming pc last longer. Get a mid gpu now and in 2 years you dont need to fully upgrade. Just get another mid gpu for 2 years.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
July 16, 2013 1:05:53 AM

PC-MAN said:
EzioAs said:
Personally, if it was me, I would use the extra money for a quad core i5 (something inexpensive like the 3350P) and then grab the GTX 660. Although to be more honest, I''ll spend a little out of budget and grab both an i5 and the GTX 760. I still think it's the better move to purchase a good quad core CPU so that it'll give me some more headroom for a GPU upgrade later. This is my opinion though, I know not a lot of people would agree with me.


Well i agree... It makes your gaming pc last longer. Get a mid gpu now and in 2 years you dont need to fully upgrade. Just get another mid gpu for 2 years.


My point exactly
m
0
l
July 16, 2013 5:33:45 AM

gary king said:
Okay thanks for the responses guys. I guess at the very least I should aim for a quad core CPU rather than stick with the dual core i3's? At the moment, as I said, in benchmarks the dual core Intels perform about the same or better than the quad core AMDs, but for the near future I imagine that new games will take better advantage of quad core AMD CPUs?


Did you decide on which cpu you would get? :) 
m
0
l
July 16, 2013 10:34:54 AM

PC-MAN said:
gary king said:
Okay thanks for the responses guys. I guess at the very least I should aim for a quad core CPU rather than stick with the dual core i3's? At the moment, as I said, in benchmarks the dual core Intels perform about the same or better than the quad core AMDs, but for the near future I imagine that new games will take better advantage of quad core AMD CPUs?


Did you decide on which cpu you would get? :) 


I'm running an NVIDIA GTX 660 2 GB with an Intel i3-3220 3.3 GHz right now. Works great so far, at least compared to my previous computer, an i3 3.2 GHz with an ATI Radeon 5670 512 MB.

I was able to run games like BioShock Infinite at the lowest resolution (1280x720) and settings for EVERYTHING at just 30 FPS or so. Now, I can run at my native 1080p resolution (1920x1080) and Ultra for about 50 FPS. This was a huge upgrade for me, and I'm very pleased! The entire PC was about $850, so I'm hoping this will last at least three years before I have to upgrade the CPU/GPU again.
m
0
l
!