Solved

9600GT - to upgrade, or not to upgrade?

Hi everyone,


I am seeking help with a build of mine. Recently, I have purchased a new motherboard (the H61M-2SPV made by Gigabyte) together with Intel Core i3-2120 APU, some RAM, HDD etc.
After a while, I found out that for my purposes (movie editing in Adobe Premiere, movie reencoding, occasional gaming, 3D rendering in Cinema 3D, DTP in InDesign), I need "better" GPU, or to be more specific, that I need discreete GPU. Luckily for me, I inherited perfectly working 9600GT from my GF's brother that I've been using for a few weeks.
However, I know that this GPU is somewhat older, and may not be exactly suited for modern day work. Since I will be adding more RAM to the rig anyway, I was wondering if someone can recommend me a GPU with silent cooler and in reasonable ($200 tops, since I will be using this in university campus and all kind of incidents can happen there) pricing. Because I quickly got used to PhysX in games, nVidia card will be preffered.
Or do you think that the 9600 is still a good card? I don't really do a lot of gaming, however for the rendering and graphic/media work, having suitable GPU can mean an hour or two difference, or so I was told.
PSU is brand new CoreXstream 500W from OCZ, but the motherboard has one PCIe slot, so multi-gpu is a no-go.


Thank you in advance.
10 answers Last reply Best Answer
More about 9600gt upgrade upgrade
  1. definately upgrade the 9600. if you are encoding videos and want a performance card for cheap go with the GTX 760. They start at $250 but will perform better for gaming and rendering than anything else at the price point.
  2. ikaz said:
    I would go for the 650 ti boost its under $200 and while you won't find a silent cooler you will find some silent cards.

    http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_650_ti_boost_windforce_review,6.html


    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GTX_650_Ti_Boost_Direct_Cu_II/25.html


    I would have to disagree. the lower memory bandwidth o the 650ti boost (192bits) would bog rendering operations tremendously compared to the 256bit bandwidth of the 760. for $50 more you really cant beat it.
  3. I wasn't saying that the 760 wasn't worth the $250 , but he was asking for a $200 card and that TOP of his budget. His other choice was using an old 9600 so if he has the money for a 650 ti boost or 9600GT (since he doesn't have the money for a 760) then the 650 is still a way better option.
  4. Actually, the reason for the budget is simple - I can register my computer to university campus insurance program for free, yet the top amount they can register is $500, so coupled with other parts and the monitor, I really can't go further than this, or I would have to use only the case with no display.
  5. Best answer
    Well either way if you top out at a 650 ti boost or a GTX 660 both can be had for under $200 (the 660 is about $200 but you can find sales).
  6. So I found out that the local store lists GTX650 Superclocked edition from EVGA for quite reasonale amount (about $130). The core clocks at 1202MHz, equipped with 1GB GDDR5@5GHz.
    Is it worthy upgrade? The price looks great due to the insurance limit and I think that since it's OC'd edition, it might be more powerful than the standard solution, however, I have no personal experience with pre-OC'd cards, so I'd like to have some opinion...

    The EVGA GTX650 Ti superclocked from the same vendor is about $160 so not that much of a change.
    And most of GTX660 sells for the very top of my insurable budget.

    So it's basically between those options, I think.
  7. Yes at $130 thats a very nice card, even though you don't game it should be able to also hand games at 1080p med-high setting. Also it has 768 cuda cores vs 64 cores on the 9600Gt so that quite a difference.
  8. ikaz said:
    Yes at $130 thats a very nice card, even though you don't game it should be able to also hand games at 1080p med-high setting. Also it has 768 cuda cores vs 64 cores on the 9600Gt so that quite a difference.


    Thank you very much. I think I'll go for it once I will finish everything out then. By the way, I do play games, but my screen is just 1680*1050 and the games I play the most are just some RPG's (love BioWare games, like Dragon Age: Origins; Dragon Age 2; Mass Effect 1/2/3; Knights of Amalur, etc.) so nothing that would be graphically demanding. Or to be more precise - nothing where the graphics will be core element.
  9. AH well for those games at 1680*1050 you should be able to max them out, heck even new games coming out this year at that rez you should be able to run them at High settings.
Ask a new question

Read More

GPUs Nvidia Build Graphics