Hello,
I've been playing a few games that have the potential to run PhysX (Borderlands 2, Planetside 2) and my jealousy has overcome me, so I'm looking into how difficult it would be to pair my current system with a cheap, dedicated GeForce card for PhysX. I read an article on tomshardware that showed an HD 5870 running PhysX with a variety of nVidia cards as well as using the CPU. With something like a GT 240, the fps was around 30, so playable.
Most of the articles I've been reading about dedicated PhysX cards are based on users with a high end GeForce card, looking to add on a cheaper card just for PhysX. And the answer is always that it's not worth it because it creates a bottleneck and ruins the performance. It was always better to run everything off of the one card.
My setup would be using an HD 6870, which obviously can't do PhysX on it's own. Using the CPU is out of the question for me, because I'd like to be able to max out the graphics options and PhysX is far too intensive to be able to run everything smoothly. My hope was to be able to buy an old, used nVidia card for like $40 and just toss it in with my current setup and add the ability to watch thousands of little bouncing particles in my games, but sadly (as usual with most things pc) it's more complicated than that.
The Question:
So what I'd like to know is whether or not adding a cheap card (like a GT 240) as a dedicated PhysX card would enhance my ability to run games with PhysX or hinder them so much, by limiting performance, that it's no longer worth it.
My Setup:
CPU - Phenom II 965 Black Ed.
GPU - XFX Radeon HD 6870
PSU - 775W (Plenty of power, shouldn't be an issue)
MOBO - M4A88TD-V EVO
RAM - 12gb 1333mhz (Before anyone makes a comment about the amount of memory, I currently work as a video editor, so no, I didn't buy 12gb just for gaming)
I use a widescreen TV as my monitor so I'm only using 1360 by 762 resolution. I know it's bad, but it's cheap and the lower resolution allows my humble setup to max out every game I've come across, except Crysis 3.
Thank you for your time. Anything you have to contribute on this topic would be greatly appreciated.
T3K
I've been playing a few games that have the potential to run PhysX (Borderlands 2, Planetside 2) and my jealousy has overcome me, so I'm looking into how difficult it would be to pair my current system with a cheap, dedicated GeForce card for PhysX. I read an article on tomshardware that showed an HD 5870 running PhysX with a variety of nVidia cards as well as using the CPU. With something like a GT 240, the fps was around 30, so playable.
Most of the articles I've been reading about dedicated PhysX cards are based on users with a high end GeForce card, looking to add on a cheaper card just for PhysX. And the answer is always that it's not worth it because it creates a bottleneck and ruins the performance. It was always better to run everything off of the one card.
My setup would be using an HD 6870, which obviously can't do PhysX on it's own. Using the CPU is out of the question for me, because I'd like to be able to max out the graphics options and PhysX is far too intensive to be able to run everything smoothly. My hope was to be able to buy an old, used nVidia card for like $40 and just toss it in with my current setup and add the ability to watch thousands of little bouncing particles in my games, but sadly (as usual with most things pc) it's more complicated than that.
The Question:
So what I'd like to know is whether or not adding a cheap card (like a GT 240) as a dedicated PhysX card would enhance my ability to run games with PhysX or hinder them so much, by limiting performance, that it's no longer worth it.
My Setup:
CPU - Phenom II 965 Black Ed.
GPU - XFX Radeon HD 6870
PSU - 775W (Plenty of power, shouldn't be an issue)
MOBO - M4A88TD-V EVO
RAM - 12gb 1333mhz (Before anyone makes a comment about the amount of memory, I currently work as a video editor, so no, I didn't buy 12gb just for gaming)
I use a widescreen TV as my monitor so I'm only using 1360 by 762 resolution. I know it's bad, but it's cheap and the lower resolution allows my humble setup to max out every game I've come across, except Crysis 3.
Thank you for your time. Anything you have to contribute on this topic would be greatly appreciated.
T3K