Need a bigger monitor (than 24") for media, graphic design, and development.

N0BOX

Honorable
Jun 3, 2012
75
0
10,640
I've been pulling my hair out trying to find a monitor that meets all my needs and desires, and I think it's time to ask the community!

What I NEED:

  • ■ 1 DisplayPort
    ■ 1 or more HDMI Ports
    ■ HDMI port must not be internally converted to DVI. The device I work with is not compatible with DVI specification. This leaves true HDMI ports such as those found in televisions. Monitors that accept audio over HDMI for internal speakers are almost guaranteed to be compatible with the device I use.
    ■ Larger than 24" (27" would be a starting point, but larger than that is cool, too)

What would be nice?:

  • ■ 3D ready
    ■ WQHD (2560x1440) resolution
    ■ Decent-sounding speakers

I'm of two minds on this one: I could spend a huge amount of money on this monitor getting very close to everything I want, or I could get most, if not all my requirements met, then buy a nice, big 3D HDTV later.

The BenQ XL2720T 27" 3D-ready gaming monitor covers several needs and wants, but because it doesn't have speakers, I worry that the HDMI port is internally converted to DVI (the monitor has a DVI port, too, so it would be easy for it to have an internal converter). I think I would prefer to have a WQHD monitor if I'm going to start getting up in the $500 range, too.

I do some development work using an ODROID-X2 dev board, which is a tiny single-board computer based on the Samsung Exynos 4 Quad SoC. It's basically the computer (or Application Processor) inside the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Note 2 without all the extra hardware that makes it a phone. Any monitor that you can plug your SGS3 or Note 2 into and get a display on the screen is compatible with my needs as far as the HDMI port is concerned. I also absolutely require a DisplayPort jack.

I want the screen to be 27" so that I can also use it for media playback purposes. I could really use a TV in that room, and a large monitor would fit the bill just fine. If it was WQHD resolution, then it would also give me a better display for graphic design work.

So, should I be pulling out more hair, or should I just get a decent, cheap 24" DP/HDMI monitor and save the huge amount of money I would have spent to start saving up for a 42"+ 3D HDTV to cover my entertainment uses?
 
Solution
I'd strongly recommend the ASUS PB278Q. If you need decent colour quality (which I'm assuming you will for graphic design) then you should avoid 120Hz displays or anything rated <5ms. Those displays will incorporate TN film panels, which can deliver high performance, but at the cost of colour quality.
I'd strongly recommend the ASUS PB278Q. If you need decent colour quality (which I'm assuming you will for graphic design) then you should avoid 120Hz displays or anything rated <5ms. Those displays will incorporate TN film panels, which can deliver high performance, but at the cost of colour quality.
 
Solution

N0BOX

Honorable
Jun 3, 2012
75
0
10,640


This one has been on my short list, and one of the only reasons I don't have one yet is just that newegg ran out of them before I could decide to buy it. When it is back in stock, and if I have the money to buy it, I'll probably end up pulling the trigger on that monitor.

The only other hesitation I have with it is that Asus is now tagging some of their monitors with a couple of really appealing warranties... One is the "Asus Rapid Replacement - Free two-way shipping" warranty, and the other (which isn't as important to me) is the "corporate Stable Model" warranty (which guarantees that they will continue to manufacture that specific model for a set period of time). While I would definitely consider good-quality monitors that aren't Asus brand, I would be very interested in having this kind of warranty on something that is fairly expensive to ship back if anything does go wrong. Of course, the Dell Ultrasharp line is fairly well-respected, so there is less reason to have to worry about something like that.

Now, for another question: I didn't put a lot of thought into the type of panel that would give the best color accuracy... I'm not really a professional graphic designer (anymore, anyway... now disabled, but still interested in it for possible future work/side jobs/personal jobs) and I just used the monitors we had at work. So, avoid TN panels... should I be looking for an IPS or PLS panel? If an IPS or PLS panel has a fast refresh, does that means its color reproduction is going to suffer? Or is color accuracy just a function of the type of panel technology? Do I really want to be looking for one of these monitors with the higher bit depth... 1.07 billion colors?
 
Absolutely IPS or PLS. Refresh rate won't harm image quality - you just don't usually get higher than 60Hz unless it's a TN panel, so <5ms response or 120/144Hz refresh rates are telltale signs that you're not looking at IPS/PLS. As for bit depth, 8 bits/component is definitely desirable. Cheaper IPS panels will use 6 bits + FRC (emulating the last two bits). Higher end models will be true 8 bits or even 8 bits + FRC (for emulated 10 bits). And then you have true 10 bits/component models. You'd need special hardware to output that anyway though so 8 bits/component is a good thing to aim for. The PB278Q is true 8-bit.