Intel Core i5-4670K Haswell 3.4GHz or a Ivy bridge Core i7-3770

WINTERLORD

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2008
1,775
15
19,815
was wondering wich of these is better there both about the same price im repalceing a core i7 920 OC 3.8 is best i can get anymore without crankin voltages and heat up exponentialy

so i was wondering out of these two wich would be faster?

also what new instruction sets does the haswell have that there near brother dont
Core i5-4670K Haswell 3.4GHz or a Ivy bridge Core i7-3770

i use a 7850 graphiocs card but might get a 760 or 770 nvidia
 
The 3770K for the most part, is very similar in performance to the 4670K in lightly-threaded apps (Gap with 4670K's per core performance can be made up with a small overclock) while it is far superior in heavily-threaded applications. The 3770K does overclock better than the 4670K and I think the 3770K would be the better all around. If you are choosing the 3770 non-k, that cannot overclock and I would suggest to get the 3570K, 4670K or 3770K over it if it is strictly gaming.
 

WINTERLORD

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2008
1,775
15
19,815
well now im thinkin a i7 and hyperthreading are must haves but i read the toms gamiung cpu thing and it seems to suggest your computer gets diminishing returns in power for processors 240 dollars and up? i wanna be able to gtame but also switch screens and webbrowsae listen to music in the background. i play guild wars 2 and like other online games
 

sarwar_r87

Distinguished
Mar 28, 2008
837
0
19,060


games will run on amd 8350 so as fast as it would run on i7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eu8Sekdb-IE&list=HL1374194872&feature=mh_lolz
at a given price, amd performs lot better in multitasking simply because they give more cores/price

i have no idea where you read that HT is useful in anything other than encoding.

but what tom said about diminishing return is common knowledge since going higher is very small increase in performance /meaningless.

when you minimize your games, it will stop using your CPU anyway. so you will be free to use other applications. you will however need 8GB RAM at least.

intel is ahead in single thread apps. but you are looking for multithreaded performance. you need cores.....not virtual threads.
 

sarwar_r87

Distinguished
Mar 28, 2008
837
0
19,060


are you having problem with performance that you are looking to upgrade from such a strong build?

anyway, here is a comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/47?vs=551
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/47?vs=836
 

bretmh

Honorable
Nov 28, 2012
95
0
10,640
I would just go for the i7 3770k, best bang for the buck.

sig.jpg
 

WINTERLORD

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2008
1,775
15
19,815
from looking at charts il be happy to jump to the 4670 intel and the gain is minor for another 100bucks i think idk though. its a tough choice because switching windows from game not to game playing a video in the backround or somthin all could use the hyperthreading although you say for gaming i wont miss much in the way of hyperthreading. what about cpu intensive or cpu bound games willo i miss the extra hypyerthreads?
 

8350rocks

Distinguished
If you're not set on Intel, you could consider the FX 8350 for less money and it would do multi-tasking as well or better than the i7.

Though, if I were you, I would consider something IB as "hasfail" isn't what it was cracked up to be. The extra money is not worth the minor gains. Real world results say you're getting less than 5% increase in performance for $50-100. That's not worth it. Tom's Hardware doesn't even recommend the 4670k for gaming, they say get the 3570k.

HTT is worthless in games, there are so few that support it that it's really just a gimmick unless you compile or render regularly.