imback :
JRAtk94 :
imback :
NOW would the dual fan (no blower style) cards heat up in any case made for gaming?
Yes. The fans would just expel hot air from the card into the case, so you'd need to have good airflow in your case.
So the 4gb is better in all cases? more memory and less heat
The
EVGA Geforce GTX 760 4GB has the "blower-style" reference cooler. That design on the reference card has a target temperature of 80°C, which is also the target on the GTX 760 boost clock. Anything below 80°C and the boost clock maxes out. Once it hits that threshold the boost algorithm scales back performance. This target can be adjusted up when overclocking which from the OP does not seem like you want to do.
The ACX cooling solution has the benefit to generally have lower temperatures on the GPU but comes at the cost of exhausting the heat into the case. The "blower-style" cooler has the benefit of exhausting the heat from the GPU out of the back of the case but generally carries higher temps than the ACX cooling solution.
As far as 4GB of VRAM on a card with a 256-bit Memory Bus is concerned, the general consensus by reviews and many on this board is that unless you are running the very specific case of running a game like Skyrim with ultra-high texture packs the VRAM will not be worth the premium of purchasing this card. A card with more RAM like the AMD Radeon 7950 with 3GB of RAM and a 384-bit bus can use the RAM a lot better and has more advantages at resolutions higher than 1080p.
I am going to state this even though it goes against the OP's question - the best performance of all the EVGA cards is the
EVGA GeForce GTX 760 SC w/ ACX Cooler. The card comes from EVGA overclocked with their 3 year warranty for only $259.99 per PCPartPicker in the link above. The ACX cooling solution, while not the best, will keep the card cooler to achieve the maximum boost for the longest period of time when at load. TechPowerUp shows that this model has a nice 6% performance advantage over the reference GTX 760 and is virtual tied with the more expensive GTX 670:
Since that card is covered by warranty I am not sure why you would not want to purchase it for $10 more. Since that was your original request the second best card would be the
EVGA GeForce GTX 760 w/ ACX Cooling for $249.99. The same cooling solution will allow mazimum boost to be achieved for the longest time gaming due to lower GPU temps. Any other card with a "blower-style" fan will not have the lowest heat on the GPU.
To address brethm's comment - The MSI GTX 760 with Twin Frozr cooling is reviewed as one the quietest, coolest GTX 760's on the market right now. Its Military Class IV components are supposed to ensure that it lasts a long period of time. Gigabyte also has a nice GTX 760 with 3X windforce cooling that's reviewed as achieving temps as low as the MSI with a little more noise but with a larger overclock out of the box, closer to the EVGA. The EVGA superclocked has the highest performance out of the box of the three but is noisier and warmer. MSI seems to be the coolest and quietest. EVGA is the top performer. The Gigabyte is the best of both worlds. Here's some charts showing the temperatures and noises from Tom's for the MSI and Gigabyte -
TechPowerUp reports the temperatures and noises for the three as follows:
MSI GTX 760 Twin Frozr Gaming
Fan noise at load: 27 dbA
Temperature at load: 69°C
Gigabyte GTX 760 Windforce
Fan noise at load: 34 dbA
Temperature at load: 68°C
EVGA GTX 760 SC w/ ACX Cooling
Fan noise at load: 38 dbA
Temperature at load: 72°C
It doesn't seem like a lot of difference but the results seem to be consistant across all review sites.