Tom's most recent review of the best Gaming CPUs for the money put the i3 above the 6300 in performance, but it's pretty close. Being able to handle 6 threads may be more important in next year's games.
Tom's most recent review of the best Gaming CPUs for the money put the i3 above the 6300 in performance, but it's pretty close. Being able to handle 6 threads may be more important in next year's games.
From everything I've seen. At stock the i3 is better overall. However, once you overclock the fx-6300 it then becomes the better CPU. I'd recommend the 6300 only for those that will overclock.
that link proves my point (stated above) with skyrim. At stock the i3 has a 10% FPS lead over the fx-6 (not a major difference) but once you OC the FX-6 the lead goes away.
There isn't a whole lot of data to compare an overclocked fx-6300 to an i3 in games, so I linked an example. Like I said, once overclocked the 6300 soars ahead of i3s.
^^At stock the the i3 beats the fx-6300 as I said. You have to buy a special aftermarket cooler to overclock it past the i3. That adds $30 to the price tag. So the fx-6300 is really $120+30=$150. The i3 sells at $130. That's a $20 difference. How much of an advantage is $20 in GPUs? quite a bit.
^^At stock the the i3 beats the fx-6300 as I said. You have to buy a special aftermarket cooler to overclock it past the i3. That adds $30 to the price tag. So the fx-6300 is really $120+30=$150. The i3 sells at $130. That's a $20 difference. How much of an advantage is $20 in GPUs? quite a bit.
Depends on the games too...like BF3 multiplayer and Crysis 3 are clearly an advantage to the FX-6XXX series, as those games can use more cores, and the i3 can't keep up...
This is entirely a "what are you doing with it, cause that will determine the better option" situation.