I'm particularly looking at Intel here, but I'm assuming this applies for most scenarios. Even more specifically, I'm looking at the 4670, a very popular choice. I'm also assuming this is going to be for gaming/general purposes.
A 4670 is $209.99. A decent H87 motherboard to go along with it, would probably be something around the cost of a H87-D3H ($103.99). That's a total cost of $313.98.
A 4670K is $225.99. A decent Z87 motherboard to go along with it, would probably be something around the cost of a Z87-D3H ($139.99). You're also going to need an aftermarket CPU Cooler. The most popular choice seems to be the Hyper 212 EVO ($29.99). That's a total cost of $395.97.
The way I'm looking at it is, you're paying an additional $81.99 to give your CPU an average overclock? Considering your gaming performance isn't going to increase at all.. since your video card is probably going to bottleneck before a stock 4670 would anyway (unless you have something along the lines of SLI 780s). Am I missing something? I'm not trying to disprove overclocking and it's effectiveness. I'm asking if the price increase is actually worth it?
A 4670 is $209.99. A decent H87 motherboard to go along with it, would probably be something around the cost of a H87-D3H ($103.99). That's a total cost of $313.98.
A 4670K is $225.99. A decent Z87 motherboard to go along with it, would probably be something around the cost of a Z87-D3H ($139.99). You're also going to need an aftermarket CPU Cooler. The most popular choice seems to be the Hyper 212 EVO ($29.99). That's a total cost of $395.97.
The way I'm looking at it is, you're paying an additional $81.99 to give your CPU an average overclock? Considering your gaming performance isn't going to increase at all.. since your video card is probably going to bottleneck before a stock 4670 would anyway (unless you have something along the lines of SLI 780s). Am I missing something? I'm not trying to disprove overclocking and it's effectiveness. I'm asking if the price increase is actually worth it?