Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

help needed. gtx 760 4gb or amd 7950 3gb or amd 7970 3gb

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
July 27, 2013 7:08:15 PM

help me by giving ur reasons for what shud i go


gigabyte gtx 760 4gb is 299$

gigabyte amd 7950 is 279$

sapphire amd radeon 7970 is 318$

gigabyte amd radeon 7970 is 378$( if at all u wanna suggest me this then tell me if its worth the extra money and in which way)

above prices are in amazon.com...
July 27, 2013 7:29:36 PM

if you want PhysX it is worth it to get a GTX 760 and later add another one in SLI.

IMO PhysX is worth it.

if not , get the 7970 3G with the 4 games bundle ...

Edit : or Just get a GTX 770 is only 380$
m
0
l
Related resources
July 27, 2013 7:37:45 PM

in what way is 770 better?? like for the extra 90$ is it worth ??
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:02:15 PM

You can overclock the 7950 to beat the 770 in most occasions. So i'm in for the 7950.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:12:09 PM

Manimal123 said:
You can overclock the 7950 to beat the 770 in most occasions. So i'm in for the 7950.

Implying the 770 can't be overclocked.

The 770 is the best of the bunch if you have the money, 760 if not. Never buy a 4GB card unless you are going multi monitor.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:19:21 PM

i have only single monitor . and i am not gonna overclock . i will jsut use it how it comes out of the box so shud i go with 770 ?
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:23:12 PM

What resolution? And why not overclock? Its free performance for sliding 2 bars to the right. People get worried when they hear overclocking, but it's perfectly fine.

Anyways, if you're at 1080p then a 760 or a 7950 will be enough. Though I recommend a 7950 because it's cheaper and has better performance.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:26:10 PM

Varun Reddy said:
i have only single monitor . and i am not gonna overclock . i will jsut use it how it comes out of the box so shud i go with 770 ?


YES !!!

Even without overclocking , it is a wonderful card
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:28:18 PM

It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:33:25 PM

Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:36:09 PM

SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous


Lmao. You're just mad that AMD is completely taking over the market and that all games are being optimized for AMD. Why would you pay $110 for 10 extra particles that only work in 5 games?

m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:37:30 PM

iam new to this overclocking stuff . so instead of spoiling the card i better get something which is better at stock
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:40:00 PM

Trust me, I know how you feel. I felt the same when I built my PC 2 weeks ago. But don't listen to all that nonsense that people tell you about your card dying. You can even keep it at stock voltages and get better performance than the 770. I'm not fanboying, I am just stating a fact.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:40:18 PM

Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous


Lmao. You're just mad that AMD is completely taking over the market and that all games are being optimized for AMD. Why would you pay $110 for 10 extra particles that only work in 5 games?



5 games ?

you are living under a rock ..

go check PhysX library ..

and by the way

Play Station 4 is PhysX enabled . all games in the future will have PhysX option.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:41:27 PM

Manimal123 said:
What resolution? And why not overclock? Its free performance for sliding 2 bars to the right. People get worried when they hear overclocking, but it's perfectly fine.

Anyways, if you're at 1080p then a 760 or a 7950 will be enough. Though I recommend a 7950 because it's cheaper and has better performance.



ya my highest resolution is 1920*1080.
i can afford 770 too. i want allllll maxxxxxxxximummm settings in my resolution so suggest me according to that . its not about cost . its just about fulll maxx ultra settings without overclocking. at 1920*1080 single monitor .
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:43:05 PM

Varun Reddy said:
iam new to this overclocking stuff . so instead of spoiling the card i better get something which is better at stock


Get GTX 770 ... you will never regret it .. and you will not need to overclock it , it is a FAST CARD.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:44:33 PM

Manimal123 said:
Trust me, I know how you feel. I felt the same when I built my PC 2 weeks ago. But don't listen to all that nonsense that people tell you about your card dying. You can even keep it at stock voltages and get better performance than the 770. I'm not fanboying, I am just stating a fact.


might be its easy but still iam too afraid to do that here in india there are very few technicians who can help me out to overclock so i dont want any trouble. if at all i at sometime i feel like to overclock. then even 770 will get overclocked n will have little better performance rite ? and this phsyx feature is good rite. the animations when physx is ON are awesome just saw a video
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:44:44 PM

SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous


Lmao. You're just mad that AMD is completely taking over the market and that all games are being optimized for AMD. Why would you pay $110 for 10 extra particles that only work in 5 games?



5 games ?

you are living under a rock ..

go check PhysX library ..

and by the way

Play Station 4 is PhysX enabled . all games in the future will have PhysX option.


I was being sarcastic to get a point across, and 21 isn't that much either. Only 2 of them people actually play. And all games in the future will be AMD optimized. Nvidia is dying every single day. AMD is going to skyrocket in sales after Battlefield 4 release because it will come free with AMD GPU's and CPU's.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:45:45 PM

Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:
What resolution? And why not overclock? Its free performance for sliding 2 bars to the right. People get worried when they hear overclocking, but it's perfectly fine.

Anyways, if you're at 1080p then a 760 or a 7950 will be enough. Though I recommend a 7950 because it's cheaper and has better performance.



ya my highest resolution is 1920*1080.
i can afford 770 too. i want allllll maxxxxxxxximummm settings in my resolution so suggest me according to that . its not about cost . its just about fulll maxx ultra settings without overclocking. at 1920*1080 single monitor .


lol depends on game

if Crysis 3 , impossible with your card ... you will need GTX 780 for crysis 3

but other games will be ok with GTX 770
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:46:00 PM

SNA3 said:
Varun Reddy said:
iam new to this overclocking stuff . so instead of spoiling the card i better get something which is better at stock


Get GTX 770 ... you will never regret it .. and you will not need to overclock it , it is a FAST CARD.


here i have one doubt is it better to get 4GB or 2GB ?? few ppl are saying if its just single monitor then 4GB is useless can someone elaborate things about that ?
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:48:38 PM

SNA3 said:
Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:
What resolution? And why not overclock? Its free performance for sliding 2 bars to the right. People get worried when they hear overclocking, but it's perfectly fine.

Anyways, if you're at 1080p then a 760 or a 7950 will be enough. Though I recommend a 7950 because it's cheaper and has better performance.



ya my highest resolution is 1920*1080.
i can afford 770 too. i want allllll maxxxxxxxximummm settings in my resolution so suggest me according to that . its not about cost . its just about fulll maxx ultra settings without overclocking. at 1920*1080 single monitor .


lol depends on game

if Crysis 3 , impossible with your card ... you will need GTX 780 for crysis 3

but other games will be ok with GTX 770


my games are

farcry 3 , borderlands , call of duty ghosts (gonna release soon ) , battlefield (yet to release) , counterstrike global offensive , dota 2 , skyrim
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:49:22 PM

Again, there are about 20 games that use Physx. The type of Physx the PS4/Xbox One/360/PS3/Mobile Games uses has NOTHING to do with the type Nvidia advertises, its not the type that those 20 or so games use.

Physx is a shitty marketing gimmick.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:51:25 PM

Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:
Trust me, I know how you feel. I felt the same when I built my PC 2 weeks ago. But don't listen to all that nonsense that people tell you about your card dying. You can even keep it at stock voltages and get better performance than the 770. I'm not fanboying, I am just stating a fact.


might be its easy but still iam too afraid to do that here in india there are very few technicians who can help me out to overclock so i dont want any trouble. if at all i at sometime i feel like to overclock. then even 770 will get overclocked n will have little better performance rite ? and this phsyx feature is good rite. the animations when physx is ON are awesome just saw a video


Nope. The overclocked 7950 beats the overclocked 770. ANd it isnt that hard. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvNhemq0HDM
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:52:26 PM

cookybiscuit said:
Again, there are about 20 games that use Physx. The type of Physx the PS4/Xbox One/360/PS3/Mobile Games uses has NOTHING to do with the type Nvidia advertises, its not the type that those 20 or so games use.

Physx is a shitty marketing gimmick.


okay forget about physx. wat about performance out of the box. whatever it is iam not gonna touch the voltages. one of my frnd tried to overclock his processor n got fucked up spoiling all the components.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:52:43 PM

cookybiscuit said:
Again, there are about 20 games that use Physx. The type of Physx the PS4/Xbox One/360/PS3/Mobile Games uses has NOTHING to do with the type Nvidia advertises, its not the type that those 20 or so games use.

Physx is a shitty marketing gimmick.


+1
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:53:47 PM

Varun Reddy said:
cookybiscuit said:
Again, there are about 20 games that use Physx. The type of Physx the PS4/Xbox One/360/PS3/Mobile Games uses has NOTHING to do with the type Nvidia advertises, its not the type that those 20 or so games use.

Physx is a shitty marketing gimmick.


okay forget about physx. wat about performance out of the box. whatever it is iam not gonna touch the voltages. one of my frnd tried to overclock his processor n got fucked up spoiling all the components.


No need to touch the voltages. Just increase core clock and memory clock on stock voltages, it still performs better than a 770.

m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:54:19 PM

Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous


Lmao. You're just mad that AMD is completely taking over the market and that all games are being optimized for AMD. Why would you pay $110 for 10 extra particles that only work in 5 games?



5 games ?

you are living under a rock ..

go check PhysX library ..

and by the way

Play Station 4 is PhysX enabled . all games in the future will have PhysX option.


I was being sarcastic to get a point across, and 21 isn't that much either. Only 2 of them people actually play. And all games in the future will be AMD optimized. Nvidia is dying every single day. AMD is going to skyrocket in sales after Battlefield 4 release because it will come free with AMD GPU's and CPU's.


total rubbish , the best games around are PhysX

I played those so far :

1-Just Cause 2 (CRAZY WATER EFFECT)
2- BATMAN
3- unreal tournament 3
4- Borderlands 2
5-Mirror edge
6- Xcom
7- Metro 2033
8- Medal of Honor


and all are top games ...

the future games are coming in physX as well.

EDIT : and BIG no , there is nothing called AMD optimized .. it is a X86 CPU .. nothing to optimize

PhysX is important. and PS4 will have it fro Nvidia.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:54:44 PM

Manimal123 said:
Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:
Trust me, I know how you feel. I felt the same when I built my PC 2 weeks ago. But don't listen to all that nonsense that people tell you about your card dying. You can even keep it at stock voltages and get better performance than the 770. I'm not fanboying, I am just stating a fact.


might be its easy but still iam too afraid to do that here in india there are very few technicians who can help me out to overclock so i dont want any trouble. if at all i at sometime i feel like to overclock. then even 770 will get overclocked n will have little better performance rite ? and this phsyx feature is good rite. the animations when physx is ON are awesome just saw a video


Nope. The overclocked 7950 beats the overclocked 770. ANd it isnt that hard. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvNhemq0HDM


iam gonna game 10 hours stretch if i overclock then again i have to worry about the temperatures too .
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:58:08 PM

what about 7970 ????
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 8:59:46 PM

SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous


Lmao. You're just mad that AMD is completely taking over the market and that all games are being optimized for AMD. Why would you pay $110 for 10 extra particles that only work in 5 games?



5 games ?

you are living under a rock ..

go check PhysX library ..

and by the way

Play Station 4 is PhysX enabled . all games in the future will have PhysX option.


I was being sarcastic to get a point across, and 21 isn't that much either. Only 2 of them people actually play. And all games in the future will be AMD optimized. Nvidia is dying every single day. AMD is going to skyrocket in sales after Battlefield 4 release because it will come free with AMD GPU's and CPU's.


total rubbish , the best games around are PhysX

I played those so far :

1-Just Cause 2 (CRAZY WATER EFFECT)
2- BATMAN
3- unreal tournament 3
4- Borderlands 2
5-Mirror edge
6- Xcom
7- Metro 2033
8- Medal of Honor


and all are top games ...

the future games are coming in physX as well.

and BIG no , there is nothing called AMD optimized .. it is a X86 CPU .. nothing to optimize

PhysX is important. and PS4 will have it fro Nvidia.


It's like talking to a brick wall, utterly incredible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_hardwar...

Unless a game is listed there, the PhysX effect is not exclusive to Nvidia card owners. There are about a billion games that support PhysX on a non Nvidia system, you listed 4 of them yourself.
SNA3 said:

what about 7970 ????

Not worth the price gap. Really you can't go wrong with the 7950, 760 or 770, just pick based on your budget they are all good. The 7950 and 760 represent the best value, the 770 if you have the cash for a little extra performance.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:02:42 PM

cookybiscuit said:
Manimal123 said:
You can overclock the 7950 to beat the 770 in most occasions. So i'm in for the 7950.

Implying the 770 can't be overclocked.

The 770 is the best of the bunch if you have the money, 760 if not. Never buy a 4GB card unless you are going multi monitor.


Well, considering a 770 = Overclocked 680, the overclocking head room on a GTX 770 is practically zero.
My friend owns the MSI Lightning GTX 770, and he can overclock from 1202 mhz to 1241 mhz. Not exactly a considerable gain there.

However, the GTX 770 for the most part is faster than the 7950, unless you get a very good piece of silicon on the 7950. If that happens, the 7950 will shred it.

(btw I do not count my 1175/1575 overclock on my 7950 as a very good piece of silicon, and some can't even make it there)


Too the OP:

Performance/Dollar:

Overclocking: 7950

Not overclocking: 760

Pure performance:

Overclocking: 7970

Not overclocking: 770
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:05:31 PM

cookybiscuit said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous


Lmao. You're just mad that AMD is completely taking over the market and that all games are being optimized for AMD. Why would you pay $110 for 10 extra particles that only work in 5 games?



5 games ?

you are living under a rock ..

go check PhysX library ..

and by the way

Play Station 4 is PhysX enabled . all games in the future will have PhysX option.


I was being sarcastic to get a point across, and 21 isn't that much either. Only 2 of them people actually play. And all games in the future will be AMD optimized. Nvidia is dying every single day. AMD is going to skyrocket in sales after Battlefield 4 release because it will come free with AMD GPU's and CPU's.


total rubbish , the best games around are PhysX

I played those so far :

1-Just Cause 2 (CRAZY WATER EFFECT)
2- BATMAN
3- unreal tournament 3
4- Borderlands 2
5-Mirror edge
6- Xcom
7- Metro 2033
8- Medal of Honor


and all are top games ...

the future games are coming in physX as well.

and BIG no , there is nothing called AMD optimized .. it is a X86 CPU .. nothing to optimize

PhysX is important. and PS4 will have it fro Nvidia.


It's like talking to a brick wall, utterly incredible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_hardwar...

Unless a game is listed there, the PhysX effect is not exclusive to Nvidia card owners. There are about a billion games that support PhysX on a non Nvidia system, you listed 4 of them yourself.
SNA3 said:

what about 7970 ????

Not worth the price gap. Really you can't go wrong with the 7950, 760 or 770, just pick based on your budget they are all good. The 7950 and 760 represent the best value, the 770 if you have the cash for a little extra performance.


price gap wat do u mean ? 7970 is 10$ cheaper than the 770
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:05:54 PM

caydn12 said:
cookybiscuit said:
Manimal123 said:
You can overclock the 7950 to beat the 770 in most occasions. So i'm in for the 7950.

Implying the 770 can't be overclocked.

The 770 is the best of the bunch if you have the money, 760 if not. Never buy a 4GB card unless you are going multi monitor.


Well, considering a 770 = Overclocked 680, the overclocking head room on a GTX 770 is practically zero.
My friend owns the MSI Lightning GTX 770, and he can overclock from 1202 mhz to 1241 mhz. Not exactly a considerable gain there.

However, the GTX 770 for the most part is faster than the 7950, unless you get a very good piece of silicon on the 7950. If that happens, the 7950 will shred it.

(btw I do not count my 1175/1575 overclock on my 7950 as a very good piece of silicon, and some can't even make it there)


Too the OP:

Performance/Dollar:

Overclocking: 7950

Not overclocking: 760

Pure performance:

Overclocking: 7970

Not overclocking: 770


I have 1200/1600 on my HIS IceQ x2 7950. Beats my friends Evga 770 by about 5 fps in all games.

m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:06:53 PM

Manimal123 said:


That's boost, not overclocked.. If you want to waste your money go ahead and get the 770. I'm just saying its much better to get a 7950 as it will outperform the 770 when overclocked.


ahh i dont wanna overclock suggest me a better stock amd card if u say 770 isnt worth.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:09:14 PM

Manimal123 said:
caydn12 said:
cookybiscuit said:
Manimal123 said:
You can overclock the 7950 to beat the 770 in most occasions. So i'm in for the 7950.

Implying the 770 can't be overclocked.

The 770 is the best of the bunch if you have the money, 760 if not. Never buy a 4GB card unless you are going multi monitor.


Well, considering a 770 = Overclocked 680, the overclocking head room on a GTX 770 is practically zero.
My friend owns the MSI Lightning GTX 770, and he can overclock from 1202 mhz to 1241 mhz. Not exactly a considerable gain there.

However, the GTX 770 for the most part is faster than the 7950, unless you get a very good piece of silicon on the 7950. If that happens, the 7950 will shred it.

(btw I do not count my 1175/1575 overclock on my 7950 as a very good piece of silicon, and some can't even make it there)


Too the OP:

Performance/Dollar:

Overclocking: 7950

Not overclocking: 760

Pure performance:

Overclocking: 7970

Not overclocking: 770


I have 1200/1600 on my HIS IceQ x2 7950. Beats my friends Evga 770 by about 5 fps in all games.



is the 7970 better than 7950 ??
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:09:25 PM

Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:


That's boost, not overclocked.. If you want to waste your money go ahead and get the 770. I'm just saying its much better to get a 7950 as it will outperform the 770 when overclocked.


ahh i dont wanna overclock suggest me a better stock amd card if u say 770 isnt worth.


Do whatever you want. Not my money. I'm just here to suggest and try to be helpful. IF you're going with the 770 don't get the Zotac. EVGA, MSI and ASUS are good.

m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:10:30 PM

Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:


That's boost, not overclocked.. If you want to waste your money go ahead and get the 770. I'm just saying its much better to get a 7950 as it will outperform the 770 when overclocked.


ahh i dont wanna overclock suggest me a better stock amd card if u say 770 isnt worth.


If you do not want to overclock, then get either the 770, or the 760. The 760 is plenty fast for all games currently. If you have the money, get the 770. Is it worth the extra $140? Possibly in the future. It will probably be able to max things out a bit longer than the 760.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:10:40 PM

Manimal123 said:
Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:


That's boost, not overclocked.. If you want to waste your money go ahead and get the 770. I'm just saying its much better to get a 7950 as it will outperform the 770 when overclocked.


ahh i dont wanna overclock suggest me a better stock amd card if u say 770 isnt worth.


Do whatever you want. Not my money. I'm just here to suggest and try to be helpful. IF you're going with the 770 don't get the Zotac. EVGA, MSI and ASUS are good.



what about gigabyte ?
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:12:16 PM

i have seen few benchmarks saying gtx 760 is like 6% faster than 7950 . not overclocked . so i want much better than 7950 . what will be the next model under 400$
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:14:14 PM

Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:
caydn12 said:
cookybiscuit said:
Manimal123 said:
You can overclock the 7950 to beat the 770 in most occasions. So i'm in for the 7950.

Implying the 770 can't be overclocked.

The 770 is the best of the bunch if you have the money, 760 if not. Never buy a 4GB card unless you are going multi monitor.


Well, considering a 770 = Overclocked 680, the overclocking head room on a GTX 770 is practically zero.
My friend owns the MSI Lightning GTX 770, and he can overclock from 1202 mhz to 1241 mhz. Not exactly a considerable gain there.

However, the GTX 770 for the most part is faster than the 7950, unless you get a very good piece of silicon on the 7950. If that happens, the 7950 will shred it.

(btw I do not count my 1175/1575 overclock on my 7950 as a very good piece of silicon, and some can't even make it there)


Too the OP:

Performance/Dollar:

Overclocking: 7950

Not overclocking: 760

Pure performance:

Overclocking: 7970

Not overclocking: 770


I have 1200/1600 on my HIS IceQ x2 7950. Beats my friends Evga 770 by about 5 fps in all games.



is the 7970 better than 7950 ??


Yes it is

Manimal123 said:
Varun Reddy said:
Manimal123 said:


That's boost, not overclocked.. If you want to waste your money go ahead and get the 770. I'm just saying its much better to get a 7950 as it will outperform the 770 when overclocked.


ahh i dont wanna overclock suggest me a better stock amd card if u say 770 isnt worth.


Do whatever you want. Not my money. I'm just here to suggest and try to be helpful. IF you're going with the 770 don't get the Zotac. EVGA, MSI and ASUS are good.



I wouldn't stray from zotac. They make good cards. Their Amp! Editions are nice.

The gigabyte windforce is a great cooler as well.

Also to the OP:

While I disagree with not overclocking, I can understand why you don't want to. A lot of people don't want to. If you aren't comfortable doing it, then don't get an AMD card. They are built for it. Nvidia overclocks FOR YOU. That is the only way they can compete with AMDs performance (at the moment). AMD offers far better performance for the overclockers, but out of the box, a 760 will beat a 7950, and a 770 will beat a 7970.
m
0
l
July 27, 2013 9:18:52 PM

hmmm so the 770 2gb is better rite compared to 760 4gb and 7970 3gb ??
m
0
l

Best solution

July 27, 2013 9:24:51 PM

Varun Reddy said:
hmmm so the 770 2gb is better rite compared to 760 4gb and 7970 3gb ??


Yes. With no overclocking at all here is how it goes:

7950 < gtx 760 < 7970 < gtx 770
Share
October 7, 2013 10:36:57 AM

SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
SNA3 said:
Manimal123 said:
It pains to see someone waste 110 more dollars instead of sliding 2 bars and getting equal performance.


it is not all about performance.

PhysX is WORTH IT. people who want AMD are those who cant pay for PhysX and nvidia and feeling jealous


Lmao. You're just mad that AMD is completely taking over the market and that all games are being optimized for AMD. Why would you pay $110 for 10 extra particles that only work in 5 games?



5 games ?

you are living under a rock ..

go check PhysX library ..

and by the way

Play Station 4 is PhysX enabled . all games in the future will have PhysX option.


I was being sarcastic to get a point across, and 21 isn't that much either. Only 2 of them people actually play. And all games in the future will be AMD optimized. Nvidia is dying every single day. AMD is going to skyrocket in sales after Battlefield 4 release because it will come free with AMD GPU's and CPU's.


total rubbish , the best games around are PhysX

I played those so far :

1-Just Cause 2 (CRAZY WATER EFFECT)
2- BATMAN
3- unreal tournament 3
4- Borderlands 2
5-Mirror edge
6- Xcom
7- Metro 2033
8- Medal of Honor


and all are top games ...

the future games are coming in physX as well.

EDIT : and BIG no , there is nothing called AMD optimized .. it is a X86 CPU .. nothing to optimize

PhysX is important. and PS4 will have it fro Nvidia.




Not great games in my eyes. x-com yeah the others meh.

m
0
l
!