970 vs 990FX

camohanna

Distinguished
I am looking to overclock a Fx-8320 and i am trying to keep the budget on the motherboard low.
Is it really necessary to get a 990FX motherboard or will a 970 one do fine for overclocking?

Motherboards i am looking at(these are just what i have seen, i am keen for different ones)

990FX:
http://www.computerlounge.co.nz/components/componentview.asp?r=p&partid=15234
http://www.pp.co.nz/products.php?pp_id=AA47223&ref=pricespy

970:
http://www.pcforce.co.nz/gigabyte-ga970aud3-amd-970-sb950-atx-socket-am3-p-2539.html
http://www.playtech.co.nz/afa.asp?idWebPage=39235&CATID=26&ID=18451&SID=29014994&ref=pricespy

As you can see, the motherboards vary in almost $100. This is where i am asking myself, do you need to get 990FX? Will i get the same overclocking results out of a 970?
 
Solution

The power phase design has nothing to do with the chipset. It's just that high-end boards with good power phase designs also tend to use more high-end chipsets.

Edit: In this case, the Gigabyte 970A-UD3 has the same number of phases as the Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3, and more than the Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0.

Maxime506

Honorable
Apr 22, 2013
1,032
0
11,960
990FX supports more features like more SATA III ports, multiple corssfire or SLI and more phrases design for extreme overclocking. If u don't overclock or just OC a little bit and have no plan putting up dual or three gfx just go straight to 970 mobo.
 

The power phase design has nothing to do with the chipset. It's just that high-end boards with good power phase designs also tend to use more high-end chipsets.

Edit: In this case, the Gigabyte 970A-UD3 has the same number of phases as the Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3, and more than the Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0.
 
Solution

camohanna

Distinguished


I think i will go with the GA-970A-UD3 as i only plan on single card. If not, i can always go the 990FX version. Thanks for help :)