I'm planning my next system build, which will use a fast 6-core CPU: something like a 4930 or 4960. I want to optimize disk performance, across many disks. Maybe a 4-disk or 6-disk RAID-0.
I want to know how to evaluate the various system-board in terms of overall aggregate disk performance. Some boards have up to 10 SATA ports. Some even have 10 6 Gb/s SATA ports. Can they really handle 10 SSDs doing I/O at 500 MB/sec? If not, how can I tell how well they perform when doing I/O to multiple disks?
In general, when a system has N SATA ports, does that generally mean that all N SATA ports can be reading/writing disk drives at the maximum speed the disk will support? Or is it instead the case that the N SATA ports are only there so you have multiple storage options, but you can only use 1 or 2 of them at full speed?
I had a similar problem years ago when I tried to connect two external USB drives to a PC and do I/O to both. The maximum aggregate I/O speed across
both USB drives was the same as to a single drive. That sucked. Are these 10-port SATA boards the same way?
I want to know how to evaluate the various system-board in terms of overall aggregate disk performance. Some boards have up to 10 SATA ports. Some even have 10 6 Gb/s SATA ports. Can they really handle 10 SSDs doing I/O at 500 MB/sec? If not, how can I tell how well they perform when doing I/O to multiple disks?
In general, when a system has N SATA ports, does that generally mean that all N SATA ports can be reading/writing disk drives at the maximum speed the disk will support? Or is it instead the case that the N SATA ports are only there so you have multiple storage options, but you can only use 1 or 2 of them at full speed?
I had a similar problem years ago when I tried to connect two external USB drives to a PC and do I/O to both. The maximum aggregate I/O speed across
both USB drives was the same as to a single drive. That sucked. Are these 10-port SATA boards the same way?