SSD not running SATA 3

Sooo I am out of ideas...
I am pretty sure my Vertex 4 is NOT running in SATA 3 as it should, I suddenly get less performance on it.

Unfortunately I never bothered to bench it previously, but Windows is reading it as 7.6 instead of the supposed 7.9.
Its also been giving a few random momentary lock-ups, that is how I picked it up.

Anyway, it is running in ACHI and in a SATA3 Intel controlled port.

SPecs in my profile.

Anyone have any ideas?
 
Solution
Use a benchmark better than Windows Experience Index :p
Try running CrystalDiskMark on the drive, if your getting Sequential Read/Writes above ~300MB/s then your on SATAIII.
Damn, it may actually be running on SATAII then.
SATA II has 3Gb/s of bandwidth, which translates to a theoretical 384MB/s. However I assumed that given some performance overhead it would be closer to 300Mb/s.

You may very well have an issue.

EDIT: We may very well have an issue.
I have the same board and the same drive, and running Crystal Disk Mark gets me 364MB/s Read and 356MB/s Write (Sequential).

However Crystal Disk Info tells me its registered to be on a SATAIII port, so I'm inclined to think its just the drive itself. Which isnt too surprising TBH, its an older drive and still on Firmware 1.4, later firmware revisions boosted performance dramataically. Its also at 60% capacity, which changes its performance profile or something.
 


Yip, I am not the paranoid kind... LOL
The Vertex 4 is supposed to get around 500Mbps.
Definitely something wrong.

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/06/27/ocz-vertex-4-256gb-review/4
 

4745454b

Titan
Moderator
Due to the 8/10bit thing, SATA II is capped at 300MBps. If you get anything over 300MBps, you are on a SATA III port.

I had this happen when I got and benched my Samsung 840pro. I had it on a SATAIII port, but not the Intel one. Double check the port and make sure you are using an Intel and not third party port. Reason being those other ports are connected sometimes with a PCIe link, which will limit you to 500MBps, and again due to overhead you'll get less. I don't remember what I got when I used my marvell port, but high 300s is what I remember. (write was even worse, around 250MBps.)