geforce 610m 1gb vs geforce 710m 1gn ?
- Thread starter sknfilip
- Start date
Solution
jaguarskx
Titan
- Apr 19, 2006
- 27,979
- 3
- 84,965
What laptop are you looking at?
In general, the GT 610m and GT 710m share the same relative performance level compared to Intel's iGPU. The older GT 610m is considered weaker than the older Intel HD 4000 (Ivy Bridge), and the newer GT 710m is considered slower than the Intel HD 4600 (Haswell). That is overall performance across the board and can very from game to game.
If the GT 710m is in an Ivy Bridge generation laptop (i3-3xxx / i5-3xxx / i7-3xxx), then it is worth getting the GT 710m. If the GT 710m is in a Haswell generation laptop, then you are better off with the getting a less expensive laptop and rely on the Intel HD 4600 iGPU.
In general, the GT 610m and GT 710m share the same relative performance level compared to Intel's iGPU. The older GT 610m is considered weaker than the older Intel HD 4000 (Ivy Bridge), and the newer GT 710m is considered slower than the Intel HD 4600 (Haswell). That is overall performance across the board and can very from game to game.
If the GT 710m is in an Ivy Bridge generation laptop (i3-3xxx / i5-3xxx / i7-3xxx), then it is worth getting the GT 710m. If the GT 710m is in a Haswell generation laptop, then you are better off with the getting a less expensive laptop and rely on the Intel HD 4600 iGPU.
jaguarskx
Titan
- Apr 19, 2006
- 27,979
- 3
- 84,965
Just a quick followup...
It seems Intel have officially released the mobile Core i3 / i5 Haswell CPUs; at least according to their webiste. Previously only the quad core i7-4xxx were available for laptops. This means there are more than just the Intel HD 4600 graphics core that is potentially available in laptops. If the laptop has the Intel HD 4200 or 4400, then you are better off with the GT 710m. But the difference in performance vs the HD 4400 will not be very much.
The Intel HD 5000 is estimated to be a little slower than the Intel HD 4600 since it is mainly in CPUs meant for ultrabooks which uses more power efficient mobile CPUs than normal laptops. However, the Intel HD 5100 and HD 5200 are more powerful than the Intel HD 4600.
It seems Intel have officially released the mobile Core i3 / i5 Haswell CPUs; at least according to their webiste. Previously only the quad core i7-4xxx were available for laptops. This means there are more than just the Intel HD 4600 graphics core that is potentially available in laptops. If the laptop has the Intel HD 4200 or 4400, then you are better off with the GT 710m. But the difference in performance vs the HD 4400 will not be very much.
The Intel HD 5000 is estimated to be a little slower than the Intel HD 4600 since it is mainly in CPUs meant for ultrabooks which uses more power efficient mobile CPUs than normal laptops. However, the Intel HD 5100 and HD 5200 are more powerful than the Intel HD 4600.
Maxime506
Honorable
- Apr 22, 2013
- 1,032
- 0
- 11,960
Well here is notebookcheck.net: http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-710M.84746.0.html
I would like to quote to prove i'm underestimated w/ GT 710M, but frankly GT 710M isn't as good as GT 630M cuz the memory bandwidth is restrained by 64-bit wide DDR3 instead of GT 630M's 128-bit.
"Depending on the clock rates, the 3D performance of the GeForce 710M is slightly faster than the GT 620M. Therefore, the previous 610M can be distanced clearly. Overall, the card is still placed in the entry level segment. Current games (as of 2013) should run fluently only in low settings."
I apologized for my misjudgement but both gfx aren't worth buying
I would like to quote to prove i'm underestimated w/ GT 710M, but frankly GT 710M isn't as good as GT 630M cuz the memory bandwidth is restrained by 64-bit wide DDR3 instead of GT 630M's 128-bit.
"Depending on the clock rates, the 3D performance of the GeForce 710M is slightly faster than the GT 620M. Therefore, the previous 610M can be distanced clearly. Overall, the card is still placed in the entry level segment. Current games (as of 2013) should run fluently only in low settings."
I apologized for my misjudgement but both gfx aren't worth buying
Maxime506
Honorable
- Apr 22, 2013
- 1,032
- 0
- 11,960
Those laptop's CPUs are out of date now, i guess, it's the manufacturer who wanna clear out the old CPUs.
It's that u could afford? I would go over i3-3110M without gfx than these two. i3-2328M is better in CPU but since i had a bad experience of HD 5450 i don't think these two gfx could do their job - gaming.
It's that u could afford? I would go over i3-3110M without gfx than these two. i3-2328M is better in CPU but since i had a bad experience of HD 5450 i don't think these two gfx could do their job - gaming.
ok maybe but only maybe i'll will buy pc;
Athlon II X4 750K
Radeon HD 7850 1GB
DDR3 8GB
1000GB
what you think,in Serbia this cost 417E?Btw i don't wan't to spend so much money,450e is limit,if u have some better processor pls tell me,and i think this 7850saphire edition is great..
Athlon II X4 750K
Radeon HD 7850 1GB
DDR3 8GB
1000GB
what you think,in Serbia this cost 417E?Btw i don't wan't to spend so much money,450e is limit,if u have some better processor pls tell me,and i think this 7850saphire edition is great..
jaguarskx
Titan
- Apr 19, 2006
- 27,979
- 3
- 84,965
Of these two laptops the 1st one is better option because the integrated graphics is just an Intel HD (no model number). Therefore, having the GT 710m is a big boost in performance and it is more power than the Intel HD 3000 and the older GT 610m in the 2nd laptop. There is not too much difference between the CPUs.
However, since you decided to build a desktop instead this info doesn't really matter anymore.
- Status
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
-
[SOLVED] Is it safe to use a recapped PSU for a long time ?- Started by zwtch_17
- Replies: 7
-
-
Discussion What's your favourite video game you've been playing?- Started by amdfangirl
- Replies: 3K
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram