Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

AMD FX 4350 Vs Intel i5 4670k

Last response: in CPUs
Share
August 29, 2013 1:54:09 PM

Is there any huge differences between these two? If so what are they?

More about : amd 4350 intel 4670k

a c 97 à CPUs
a b À AMD
a b å Intel
August 29, 2013 2:01:34 PM

yeah, a lot, google 4670k review.
m
0
l
a c 210 à CPUs
a b À AMD
August 29, 2013 2:03:31 PM

The 8350 is the AMD CPU you should compare to the 4670k. Those 2 are usually very close...
m
0
l
Related resources

Best solution

a c 218 à CPUs
a c 104 À AMD
a c 130 å Intel
August 29, 2013 2:04:47 PM

The first difference right off the bat that you'll notice is the $110 price difference between the two. The next difference is when it comes to gaming and the Intel CPU while more expensive does give a greater gaming performance then the FX-4350.
This gaming Hierarchy Chart will give you an idea of where processors stand in rankings.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-cpu-review-o...

If your on a tight budget then go for the FX-4350 , if you have the money in your budget for it then go with the i5-4670k and you will not be sorry that you did.
Share
a c 114 à CPUs
a b À AMD
a b å Intel
August 29, 2013 2:05:38 PM

Yes, the 4670k is a much faster CPU. But its kind of an unfair comparison the 4350 is a much cheaper low to mid range cpu while the 4670k is a high end unit. Looking at a benchmark score like Passmark the FX-4350 scores 5057, while the 4670k scores 7537 ~ 50% faster. Whether or not you will notice the performance difference depends on what the system is being used for.
m
0
l
August 29, 2013 2:11:26 PM

I don't personally understand the difference so could you explain this to me?
m
0
l
a c 97 à CPUs
a b À AMD
a b å Intel
August 29, 2013 2:13:05 PM

Dean Fry said:
I don't personally understand the difference so could you explain this to me?


i5 4670K > FX4350
Is that simple enough?
Or you should change your avatar to a troll?
m
0
l
a c 210 à CPUs
a b À AMD
August 29, 2013 2:14:31 PM

rgd1101 said:
Dean Fry said:
I don't personally understand the difference so could you explain this to me?


i5 4670K > FX4350
Is that simple enough?


He's talking about apples and oranges there...the 2 are not comparable. For one...the 4670k is 100% more expensive...
m
0
l
a c 97 à CPUs
a b À AMD
a b å Intel
August 29, 2013 2:15:56 PM

8350rocks said:
rgd1101 said:
Dean Fry said:
I don't personally understand the difference so could you explain this to me?


i5 4670K > FX4350
Is that simple enough?


He's talking about apples and oranges there...the 2 are not comparable. For one...the 4670k is 100% more expensive...


but it correct in both, i5 4670K cost more and also perform better. Probably just another troll. A new account with 2 post.

m
0
l
August 29, 2013 2:18:19 PM

rgd1101 said:
Dean Fry said:
I don't personally understand the difference so could you explain this to me?


i5 4670K > FX4350
Is that simple enough?
Or you should change your avatar to a troll?


Yes I know that but I want to know why, all I know so far is that both are in different price brackets, both are quad cores and the FX-4350 has 4.2 GHz.

From my uneducated point of view, I don't see the difference which is why I am asking a forum.
m
0
l
a c 114 à CPUs
a b À AMD
a b å Intel
August 29, 2013 2:21:46 PM

The difference is the the architecture they use. The Intel architecture is able to process more data(instructions) per clock than the AMD. Which is why the Intel is faster even with its lower clock speeds.
m
0
l
August 29, 2013 2:43:33 PM

bignastyid said:
The difference is the the architecture they use. The Intel architecture is able to process more data(instructions) per clock than the AMD. Which is why the Intel is faster even with its lower clock speeds.


Right I see, thank you.

So Haswell CPU's will be the fastest ones then?
m
0
l
a c 218 à CPUs
a c 104 À AMD
a c 130 å Intel
August 29, 2013 3:28:45 PM

Yes.
m
0
l
a c 478 à CPUs
a c 120 À AMD
a c 117 å Intel
August 29, 2013 7:10:23 PM

Below are some benchmarks I posted in a different thread to answer a question regarding the old Core 2 Quad Q6600, but they can be used to help you decide which CPU to choose. It starts off with a game that has pretty low system requirements (Call of Duty: Black Ops 2) and ends with the current most hardware brutalizing game (Crysis 3).

As can be seen CoD BO 2 is fairly easy to run. The difference in performance varies very little on modern CPUs which includes AMD's Bulldozer & PileDriver CPUs and Trinity APU and Intel's Bloomfield (1st gen core i7), and Ivy Bridge CPUs.

The BioShock Infinite is also fairly consistent for AMD and Intel CPUs. Intel CPUs generally provide a few more FPS than AMD CPUs, and likely not noticeable to most people.

In Far Cry 3 we begin to see a wider spread in performance based on the CPU. I believe many games will show something similar to this effect in Far Cry 3 and in BioShock. Of there are more CPU intensive games out there.

Hitman: Absolution is a such a game that is more CPU intensive the most other games; at least in my opinion. With the exception of strategy games (Civilization 5, Diablo 3, Star Craft 2, X-Com: Enemy Unknown) which traditionally have been very CPU dependent games. The difference in performance between different CPUs is pretty pronounced.

Lastly, there is Crysis 3. Note that the graphics in this game is benchmarked at medium instead of high; which was used in the other benchmarks. The difference is not quite as dramatic as in Hitman, but considering the benchmark results with medium quality, if you want to play the game the highest quality, then a more powerful CPU would be preferable. However, Crysis 3 is an exception. It does not represent the system requirements necessary to play all games with maximum graphics quality.

http://www.techspot.com/review/601-black-ops-2-performa...


http://www.techspot.com/review/655-bioshock-infinite-pe...


http://www.techspot.com/review/615-far-cry-3-performanc...


http://www.techspot.com/review/608-hitman-absolution-pe...


http://www.techspot.com/review/642-crysis-3-performance...

m
0
l
!