hafijur :
That video is like a troll video. A game that intel destroys the fx he has with a straight face saying the fx destroys the intel. I think that video embarrasses logan more then anything how wrong the test results are.
Multitasking is intel cpus strong point while amd struggle more so on this as in intel systems feel snappier. An i3 3220 would be enoigh for what the op does and it saves a lot of electricity. Look here metro 2033 no real difference:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6934/choosing-a-gaming-cpu-single-multigpu-at-1440p/5
vs logan 8 fps win for fx8350. His benchmarks are embarrassing, he probably had old drivers installed with lots of bacckground processes running on intel system while the amd system he took the highest score he could get. Trine2 is a game you get intel cpus for and amd struggle at it he says the opposite with his bias results.
There are various reason why Logan's results differ from other test sites benchmarks. I think the fact that you jump so quickly to assuming Logan rigged the results or just plain lied is a knee-jerk reaction from your own bias for Intel and that you just can't believe those results even though they very well could be true results from those specific systems.
I don't want to get into this again, but just for the sake of the OP, I wanted to just briefly comment on a couple things so that 50mk doesn't get the wrong idea.
hajifur, you said look at metro 2033, no real difference. Ok, looking at the first chart, they're running at 1440 max settings. Nearly ALL the results were in the 30-35fps range, regardless of CPU. Of course there's no real difference here because with that game at 1440 and max settings, the 7970 must be bottle necking the system on the graphics side.
Looking further down at the same settings with 2 and 3 7970's we see the 8350 running 10+ fps faster than the 3220. Not a massive difference, but the gap between the 8350 and i7's is far less at 1-5fps on the dual crossfire setup. So you see, once you reduce the bottle necking on the graphics side, then you start to see the real difference in CPU performance.
Also, based on all the results posted on that page, it would be safe to say that that game is very demanding on graphics and not so much on the CPU and thus, it wouldn't make sense to buy a CPU that's $100+ more expensive for pretty much the exact same results.