Roland Of Gilead :
mr1hm :
SimonGranstrom :
Voltage is at 1.293 and the temps never passes 70 C when playing Arma 3.
EDIT: Lowered speed to 4.6, made no difference.
http://valid.canardpc.com/2898720
i think 70C is fine, at least while playing Arma 3. AIDA's FPU test is extremely intensive on the CPU and will stress your chip harder than P95. Haswell's MAX temperatures (Tj max) are 105C but, i highly recommend you stay under 90C to prevent throttling of the CPU.
I wont get into which is the better for stress testing, AIda, Prime or IBT. They are all similar, some getting your CPU hotter than others. I think its widely accepted that, a combination of two of those is good, but P95 being the main one, as it can find stability issues where the others do not.
it's true that P95 can show stable results and that it's a solid stress test but, there have been countless articles/reviews/threads about the potential harm P95 can bring onto the CPU; also, there has always been lots of talk over why CPUs crash in a simple game when they've tested for 8+ hours. your statement about P95 finding stability issues where other programs do may have been true a while ago, but P95 is unrealistic, sure it can ramp up your temperatures and have you believe that you're going to stable in ALL things you do on that PC but, it completely misses specific areas of the CPU...
Asus and Intel have already stated AIDA64 is recommended as its' stress tests have been designed for the Haswell architecture. it will test those specific areas like AVX/AES and other instruction sets that P95 just completely misses...
Simon, my recommendation for you is to go with a quick test of AIDA64's FPU stress test, make sure your monitoring the temps and don't plan on running it for long as youll quickly notice an extreme rise in temperatures, i usually stick with around 30min to 1 hour; after that, launch Arma/most used programs and make sure there are no irregularities or WHEA erorrs.
4.6 is a solid overclock