Need help with wireless adapter solution.

Diclonus

Honorable
Sep 1, 2013
2
0
10,510
I recently upgraded to a Linksys EA6200, originally owning a EA4500 which was wireless-n router. I'm looking to take advantage of the new AC technology that my current router provides, ergo I'm looking for an adapter that can utilize the AC 5Ghz band.

So far I've narrowed it down to a couple of choices, but if you have any suggestions they are more than welcome:

1.) Linksys WUSB6300 $59.99 - http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Wireless-AC+USB+3.0+Adapter/9404119.p?id=1219015280006&skuId=9404119&st=wusb6300&cp=1&lp=1

This is a candidate because it is ac-compatible and uses USB 3.0; however, I'm a little iffy on this because I currently use an AE2500 usb adapter and everytime I power on my PC I have to unplug it and plug it back in.

The second is an ethernet-bridge (I believe it's called) - the Linksys WUMC710 - $99.99 - http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Cisco+-+Wireless-AC+Media+Connector/7008516.p?id=1218837209618&skuId=7008516&ref=06&loc=01&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=7008516&extensionType={adtype}:{network}&s_kwcid=PTC!pla!{keyword}!{matchtype}!{adwords_producttargetid}!{network}!{ifmobile:M}!{creative}&kpid=7008516&k_clickid=2fe55c23-95ab-0c48-6b7b-000050fa6c0e

(both are linksys products because I can only assume that same brand products play better with each other, forgive me if i'm wrong)

I've been doing my research and came across a post that gave a great number of reasons to go with an ethernet bridge compared to a usb dongle. I'm looking for a solution that will be more stable and more permanent so to speak.
Can you guys help me decide on what to buy? Do you have any qualms or issues with one or the other? Do you suggest any other alternative to USB/Ethernet bridge?

I need a new wireless adapter because I recently built a new computer and it's going to be used for heavy gaming, internet downloading and what not.
I rent a duplex and sit right above the router if that info helps. Wired isn't possible since I'm not allowed to drill through anything :(

Also, the motherboard I use is a Sabertooth Z87. I figured that information is good since I've heard some things like the Asus PCE-66 something has had some major compatibility issues.

Thank you very much for taking your time to read such a long post! All opinions are welcome!
 
I tend to like the bridge devices better mostly because with USB you are limited to 15ft where ethernet is 100m. In situation where the place you want to use the computer is not the optimum place to get wifi signal it is nice to be able to put the radio in one place and the computer in another.

Used to be you could put big direction antenna on bridges easier but that is not so simple now days with mimo and the need for 3 antennas that have optimum spacings. The good thing about a bridge is it will work with any device that has a ethernet port no worry about USB drivers or if the device has a port.

Now being a guy I look at functionality as priority 1 and appearance is a far second. Some people ie my x-girlfriend would constantly complain about messy cables. SHE would much prefer a little USB adapter plugged into the back of the computer where you can't see it.

802.11ac is nothing magic. Although they talk about some beam forming stuff I don't know how well that actually works. For games faster speeds mean nothing you need quality signal. There are a couple of downsides to 802.11ac. It only runs on 5g band. 5g band has much less coverage because it is blocked much easier. So if 802.11n running on 5g does not get good coverage 802.11ac will not fix that. The second is 802.11ac uses 4 channels. Just like using 2 channels on 802.11n on the 2.4g band you now increase you chance of interference because you are now using more of the limited bandwidth there is.

For a game you may be best off using 2.4g on a single 20mhz channel. You will still get well over 54m and a game will be lucky to use 1m.