New Intel i7-4930K Processor

DevinC

Honorable
Sep 10, 2013
100
0
10,690
Basically I'm wondering what the real pull is for this chip compared to the 4770K? I was going to order the 4770k processor soon with an ASUS z87-deluxe, but now, looking at the new chip they just put out I'm wondering if I should hold off for a bit. Thoughts?
 
Solution
It depends on what your needs are. The 4930k is approximately a 3770k +50% in multithreaded tasks (6 cores with HT instead of 4). The 4770k is a 3770k +5-10% in everything: single threaded apps, rendering, etc. The 4770k will be more cost effective, especially in single threaded stuff.

cuecuemore

Distinguished
It depends on what your needs are. The 4930k is approximately a 3770k +50% in multithreaded tasks (6 cores with HT instead of 4). The 4770k is a 3770k +5-10% in everything: single threaded apps, rendering, etc. The 4770k will be more cost effective, especially in single threaded stuff.
 
Solution

DevinC

Honorable
Sep 10, 2013
100
0
10,690
Thanks again! I'm looking more into getting the 4820K because of the LGA 2011. The board I'm looking at pairing it with is the Asus X79 Sabertooth TUF with the main interest being the 8 RAM slots. But if you don't mind me asking, what are some other benefits in your opinion. (Oh, and in your last post, did you mean 4770K?)
 

DevinC

Honorable
Sep 10, 2013
100
0
10,690
So which would you recommend for a build focusing on gaming, multitasking, and hobbies including graphic design etc? I have a pc with a q6600 which still runs well, but making a completely new build. I only really wanted to spend 650 on the motherboard and cpu and the 4770k and 4830k fit that budget, but I'm torn. Another possibility is holding off for a bit and getting 4930k.
 

cuecuemore

Distinguished
Definitely the 4770k, if you even need that much processing power. If you're gaming and hobbying design, maybe even the 4670k and put the rest of it into the rest of the build. But that all depends on what programs you're using for your design.
 
First decide if you actually have a need for the Intel 6 core CPU, it's ridiculously expensive along with the LGA2011 motherboards required for it. If you don't need it then you can get one of the i5 or i7's along with a LGA1155 board and put that extra money into better SSD's, GPU's or the bank account.
 

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador


Personally, I would only get LGA2011 if I was getting a 6 core CPU, dont see the point otherwise..
 

jaov2k

Honorable
Mar 11, 2013
16
0
10,510

DevinC

Honorable
Sep 10, 2013
100
0
10,690
The first article you posted said they were basically the same and with future firmware updates the 4820k will pull ahead. It said just go for the desired features, but that's the problem haha. In the end, I think I'm leaning towards the 4770k.
 

CAB916

Honorable
Sep 14, 2013
1
0
10,510
I highly suggest you purchase the 4820K and 2011 socket motherboard. stay far away from the 4770k or any socket besides 2011.

At the end of 2014 we will see Haswell-E and your motherboard will be useless if you don't have a 2011 socket to support the 8 physical Core haswell-E cpu's.
 
The Haswell E CPUs will require a new socket and will most likely not be compatible to the current LGA 2011 socket.

The E processors are unique in the design and function and if you have the need for their capabilities then you should deffinetly go with one most likely the i7-4930k.
There is one feature that I didn't see mentioned here and that is the fact that the E processors come with 40 lanes of Pci-e bandwidth compared to the 16 lanes of the regular CPUs. What this means is that when installing multiple video cards for SLI or CrossFire you can have the full x16 lanes of Pci-e bandwidth for the first two cards instead of the x8 x8 that you get with the others.
If you look at the details tab of those motherboards you will see the Pci-e slots say x16 , x8 x8 and the LGA 2011 motherboard will sat x16 x16 x8.

Naturally if you are not planning multiple video cards then this is of no benefit and you will then only have the benefit of the added cores , so a six core with hyper threading would then be a twelve core or twelve processing threads.