Intel HD 4000 and Nvidia GT 630M - Almost no difference. Why?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
The Tiger

The Tiger

Honorable
Aug 30, 2013
222
2
10,715
I ran Furmark in my Asus K55VM laptop, equipped with Intel HD 4000 and Nvidia GT 630M graphics processors.

I rendered for 2 minutes. At 1366x768 reolution, The 3-D rendering in HD 4000 gave an average of 8 FPS, while the GT 630M gave 9 FPS.

Why is there so little of difference? I thought the GT 630M is powerful enough, even for gaming purposes!
 
Solution
Heironious
The 630 is very, very low end on it's own if there WAS a desktop version. The 630M would be even weaker than the desktop one. Laptop stuff will usually be weaker than the PC parts of its equivalent.
Sort by date Sort by votes
Heironious

Heironious

Honorable
Oct 18, 2012
687
0
11,360
The 630 is very, very low end on it's own if there WAS a desktop version. The 630M would be even weaker than the desktop one. Laptop stuff will usually be weaker than the PC parts of its equivalent.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom