8320 vs 4670k for battlefield?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Poseidon2000

Poseidon2000

Honorable
Nov 18, 2012
26
0
10,530
Ok, I know that everyone is saying that the 4670k is better than the 8350, and overall it is. However, people say that for games that utilize many cores (bf4 uses 6 amd cores??) such as battlefield, would the 8350 have a slight edge? Also, since I have only had experience with crappy gateway laptops and ps3's , would i really tell a difference? the reason is that the 8350 with the asus 990fx pro is $100 cheaper than the 4670k w/ asus z78 pro on newegg.

What are your thoughts? Your help is much appreciated.:)
 
Solution
edogawa
Does this help you? Given the game will be optimized more by release, this should be close to what you can expect.

http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-alpha-gpu-and-cpu-benchmarks/

Get the 8350.


500x1000px-LL-04d6fd37_bf4proz.jpeg
Sort by date Sort by votes
cuecuemore

cuecuemore

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2010
2,190
0
20,460
According to these alpha benchies, the 8350 and 4-core, non-HT Intels are neck and neck in BF4:
http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-alpha-gpu-and-cpu-benchmarks/
But then, they're from a couple months back, so anything could happen between then, beta, and release, not to mention updates and further optimization.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Poseidon2000

Poseidon2000

Honorable
Nov 18, 2012
26
0
10,530
oooh, this helps a lot! if im not mistaken, on the chart, The 8350 would be actually one of the best processors for bf3? As for gpus,However, atm I'm DEFINITELY not getting the titan. a 770 would be lucky for me. :D
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
leeb2013

leeb2013

Honorable
Aug 5, 2013
1,967
0
12,460


you signed up 2 weeks ago just to make comments like this in threads that are 8 months old and you're absolutely certain you are not the idiot?
 
Upvote 1 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom