E8400 and HD5670 - good match?

Hi,

I was wondering if my current rig has a good balance, or is the GPU too weak for the CPU? Maybe the other way around?

HP DC7900 mini tower
4gb ram (is this enough?)
E8400 C2D 3.0 ghz processor
365w stock psu
HD 5670 512mb graphics card (gddr5)

I have a 16:9 monitor (up to 1920x1080) and I'm very much a casual PC gamer although I do play the occasional shooter / action adventure on whatever settings I can get away with. Would be willing to upgrade PSU if needed.

Thanks
 
By 'mini tower' do you mean slimline? some people get confused.
For that res I'd actually think of bumping the card up a notch to the HD7790/GTX650Ti level would be better.
Yes, you'll need to get a better PSU, 450Watts with a single PCI-E connector (6 pin, 8 pin or 6+2 pin) from: Corsair, Antec, Silverstone, Seasonic, OCZ, Pc Power and Cooling or XFX will do the trick. If you pay >$50 (US) you're not trying hard enough ;).
 
Must have been nice during our short summer-surfing the 'net, top down, shades on, wind in your hair ;).
You probably know these but just in case here's a few places to look: Dabs, Overclockers, Aria, CCL, Pixmania, Scan, Ebuyer, Novatech and the ever popular Amazon.
 
Your "convertible" PC is basically standard size short PC tower.

Your 365w PSU will actually be able to handle a Radeon HD 7770. A standard 300w Dell / HP PSU will be able to handle a Radeon HD 7750 without issue (almost 60w peak power). The Radeon HD 7770 should be fine on a 365w PSU; peak power usage is basically 75w for a stock speed HD 7770 and about 85w for an overclocked HD 7770.

AMD / nVidia general recommendation for power supplies meant to cover a wide variety of different PCs with different components. For example, if you had an AMD CPU, then I would definitely recommend you upgrade the PSU because AMD CPUs can use lot more power than Intel CPUs. Under full load the AMD FX-8350 uses about 95w - 105w more power than the Intel i5-4670k. That's with stock speed. If both CPUs were overclocked then the difference would be even larger. The E8400 does not use a lot of power. In other words, you are safe.

 

FunSurfer

Distinguished


Sorry I wasn't clear enough, I was referring to gaming with stock E8400. User will experience some CPU bottlenecks with games at least as heavy as Crysis 1 with more powerful GFX. Of course this CPU will run just fine with dual Titans.
Example, Crysis 3:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ivy-bridge-wolfdale-yorkfield-comparison,3487-18.html
 

I only tried Crysis 2 but that ran nice and smoothly @90+ fps, a CPU "bottleneck" would result in the game displaying a "glug glug" fashion where it runs normally then slows and then runs normally then slows etc. The term "bottleneck" gets used so often by people who haven't seen and have no idea where the phrase came from means that its now a pointless term that is just overused and misunderstood IMO.
 

FunSurfer

Distinguished
"Bottleneck" here is when the GFX can't operate in its full potential because the CPU will be holding it back. In the link I posted there are several games which are running on the same GFX (7970) and the lowest scores are coupled with the E8400, so buying that card for the E8400 is a waste of money.
 


I understand your usage of the term but it still isn't entirely the same as the first usage of the term and whilst an e8400 might not allow the card to run at its full potential it won't prohibit the smooth running of games.
 

FunSurfer

Distinguished


Oh, so there is a constant bottleneck and a dynamic bottleneck!
 


Pretty much! A slow CPU will hold back the performance of a fast graphic card and whilst that can and is referred to as the bottleneck of the system the term was first used to describe what the user sees when the graphic card(s) actually overpowers the CPU and the visuals take on that "glug glug" effect that you would get from inverting a wine bottle full of liquid if you were to equate the flow of liquid to the smoothness of the graphical display.
 


I'd have to use molex though, my stock psu doesn't have a 6 pin. But I'm a little surprised to hear I could get away with a 7770 without a PSU upgrade.
 
Generally, you should be able to with HP and Dell PSUs; especially Dells because they actually underrate their PSUs a bit so if a Dell PSU states 300w it may actually be around 320w or so. That info came from a former Dell tech support employee that used to lurk around this forum. I believe there were also a couple of review articles from a while ago that actually confirmed that statement.

Your PSU will be more than enough for a Radeon HD 7750. Kinda busy right now, but I believe Newegg is (or maybe was) selling a Radeon HD 7750 DDR5 1GB card for $65 - $70 after rebate.
 
A 7750 will be able to run on that power supply very easily and is a bit cheaper than a 7770, but is on the lower end of gaming cards. So if you upgrade the system, you will be stuck with that slower card (although it's not SLOW, just slow in gaming card land).

A 7770 should run fine on your stock power supply also, I've run that card on a 320 watt PSU, although I would not do that for long.

Overall, I'd get the 7770 for the fact that it would be faster in a future system, it should be just fine on a 365w power supply without stressing it too much.