Articles & News
Graphics & Displays
Tom's IT Pro
Login | Sign Up
The authority on tech
What's the most efficient or more effective first and second upgrade for my low end build?
Sep 27, 2013, 8:26 PM
My low specs are:
Intel G1610 (like I said i just want a computer at the beginning)
Corsair XMS 4GB 1333Mhz
500gb WDC Caviar blue
500w FSP Supersonic
GT 630 2gb DDR3
The computer is supposed for gaming, but we decided to just get a normal computer. altough we can play some games at decent fps like 28+ fps not everything on high.
we want to change the processor and the video card. we want an i3 3210 and hd 7770. what is better? the proccesor fisrt and video second? or vice-versa?
Oct 14, 2013
Oct 14, 2013
efficient effective upgrade low end build
Oct 3, 2013, 7:38 AM
To answer the question in the title: depends on your budget and what settings/resolution you want to play at.
To answer your second question: depends on what games you play.
Oct 5, 2013, 8:12 PM
I play on 720p
Games like crysis 3, far cry 3 and skyrim.
What would you upgrade first?/most cost efficient
What would you first upgrade in a low end pc ?
What to upgrade first to make my desktop a low end gaming PC ?
Can't find your answer ? Ask !
Get the answer
Oct 8, 2013, 6:52 AM
Oct 14, 2013, 3:46 AM
I don't initially have the budget though.
im just asking if you could think at it could be better to upgrade the video card first to HD 7770, with the processor celeron G1610
Oct 14, 2013, 4:04 AM
I'd say definitely video card first and get a 7790 instead of a 7770 if you can afford it. Either one would be a huge improvement over the GT630
Oct 14, 2013, 8:06 AM
Ahh, i will go to HD 7770 thank you for suggesting HD 7790 but the price is too high for me, so, HD 7770 it is.
Oct 14, 2013, 8:22 AM
The 7770 should be able to play all three of the games you've mentioned @720p, enjoy
Ask a new question
Subscribe to our newsletter
icon arrow stem circle
About Tom's Hardware
Licensing and Reprints
Other Shopsavvy sites
© 2017 Purch All Rights Reserved.