Dedicated PhysX Card
- Thread starter Ramin-Ras
- Start date
Solution
17seconds
Champion
- Jul 27, 2010
- 10,584
- 4
- 51,965
With that setup, you need to go big in order to avoid slowing down your performance. Really, I wouldn't recommend anything less than a GTX 660 or above with that setup. There's very little in the way of benchmarks on the topic, but here's something to give you an idea of what we're talking about.
http://physxinfo.com/articles/
The conclusions of this article support the idea that a good PhysX card needs both a high number of CUDA cores and a high clock speed. That explains why a GTX 650Ti seems a little better than a GTX 680. Honestly, if money is not object, for competitive purposes, I would be looking at a GTX 770 with a high clock speed and high CUDA core count.
http://1pcent.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/borderlands_2_results2_graph.png
http://physxinfo.com/articles/
The conclusions of this article support the idea that a good PhysX card needs both a high number of CUDA cores and a high clock speed. That explains why a GTX 650Ti seems a little better than a GTX 680. Honestly, if money is not object, for competitive purposes, I would be looking at a GTX 770 with a high clock speed and high CUDA core count.
http://1pcent.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/borderlands_2_results2_graph.png
cookybiscuit
Honorable
- Aug 31, 2012
- 3,406
- 0
- 13,460
I'm guessing you are made of money with those 690's. If you want more performance sell them off and get 3 780's.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
News Microsoft updates Windows 11 24H2 requirements, CPU must support SSE4.2 or the OS will not boot- Started by Admin
- Replies: 14
-
-
-
Question New Build GPU help- ASRock Steel Legend OC Radeon RX 7900 GRE - Keeps turning off
- Started by bp240
- Replies: 6
-
Question How can I make my AMD GPU scale *all* resolutions to 1080p, even resolutions that are "supported" by my TV?
- Started by Sol33t303
- Replies: 7
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram