Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Radeon HD 6670

Tags:
  • AMD
  • FPS
  • Graphics
  • Go
  • Graphics Cards
  • Radeon
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
September 29, 2013 4:53:01 PM

Hello, I just have one question, when you play games like BTF3 or Crysis 3, if you play on medium settings, and you go to high resolution settins- will the fps go down? Because I'm getting the Radeon 6670, and I want to find out, and what's the problem if you play with 30 or 35 fps?
Well, thanks in advance, bye.

More about : radeon 6670

September 29, 2013 4:58:43 PM

yes they will decrease. That is the point of having settings
m
0
l

Best solution

a c 260 À AMD
a c 429 U Graphics card
September 29, 2013 4:59:10 PM

The higher your settings are the lower your fps is. Theres a relation there that never changes. There is no problem at lower fps but preference, I am fine with 30, others need 60. Once you hit 20 range it starts to get choppy. If you havent got the card you I would recommend against it, as that is by no means a gaming card.
Share
Related resources
a b U Graphics card
September 29, 2013 5:05:55 PM

I'd say get at least a 7770 or don't bother. Unless your monitor is 1024 x 768 then... Maybe.
m
0
l
October 2, 2013 10:32:34 AM

Gam3r01 said:
The higher your settings are the lower your fps is. Theres a relation there that never changes. There is no problem at lower fps but preference, I am fine with 30, others need 60. Once you hit 20 range it starts to get choppy. If you havent got the card you I would recommend against it, as that is by no means a gaming card.


Oh, well. And, what would be better: play in high settings or ultra settings with low fps or play on medium with 50 or higher fps?
As for me I wouldn't buy the card but I know a guy that's selling a PC with the following specifications and it's cheap for what is it:
AMD Phenom II 955 x4
AMD Radeon 6670
Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3 (Socket M2)
488gb SATA Samsung Hard Drive
4gb Double Chanel DDR3
MS-Windows 7 64-bit SP1
It costs 3000 pesos here in Argentina that is about 518 dollars, but here the thing's are much more expensive, so i'm going to upgrade later, maybe a few months or something...
m
0
l
October 2, 2013 12:34:25 PM

blue_sTyl3 said:
Gam3r01 said:
The higher your settings are the lower your fps is. Theres a relation there that never changes. There is no problem at lower fps but preference, I am fine with 30, others need 60. Once you hit 20 range it starts to get choppy. If you havent got the card you I would recommend against it, as that is by no means a gaming card.


Oh, well. And, what would be better: play in high settings or ultra settings with low fps or play on medium with 50 or higher fps?
As for me I wouldn't buy the card but I know a guy that's selling a PC with the following specifications and it's cheap for what is it:
AMD Phenom II 955 x4
AMD Radeon 6670
Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3 (Socket M2)
488gb SATA Samsung Hard Drive
4gb Double Chanel DDR3
MS-Windows 7 64-bit SP1
It costs 3000 pesos here in Argentina that is about 518 dollars, but here the thing's are much more expensive, so i'm going to upgrade later, maybe a few months or something...


That setup gets me 30-40 fps on battlefield 3 low at 1680 by 1050. Crysis 2 runs a 30 on low at 1600x900.
m
0
l
October 3, 2013 2:40:23 PM

shellls45 said:
blue_sTyl3 said:
Gam3r01 said:
The higher your settings are the lower your fps is. Theres a relation there that never changes. There is no problem at lower fps but preference, I am fine with 30, others need 60. Once you hit 20 range it starts to get choppy. If you havent got the card you I would recommend against it, as that is by no means a gaming card.


Oh, well. And, what would be better: play in high settings or ultra settings with low fps or play on medium with 50 or higher fps?
As for me I wouldn't buy the card but I know a guy that's selling a PC with the following specifications and it's cheap for what is it:
AMD Phenom II 955 x4
AMD Radeon 6670
Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3 (Socket M2)
488gb SATA Samsung Hard Drive
4gb Double Chanel DDR3
MS-Windows 7 64-bit SP1
It costs 3000 pesos here in Argentina that is about 518 dollars, but here the thing's are much more expensive, so i'm going to upgrade later, maybe a few months or something...


That setup gets me 30-40 fps on battlefield 3 low at 1680 by 1050. Crysis 2 runs a 30 on low at 1600x900.


And 1680 by 1050 is okay i guess right? In a 5ms monitor?
m
0
l
a b À AMD
a c 92 U Graphics card
October 3, 2013 2:45:08 PM

Higher detail or higher fps is a personal preference, people who play really competitively or online usually want all the fps they can get, while people who play on their own tend towards detail...
m
0
l
October 3, 2013 4:29:43 PM

blue_sTyl3 said:
shellls45 said:
blue_sTyl3 said:
Gam3r01 said:
The higher your settings are the lower your fps is. Theres a relation there that never changes. There is no problem at lower fps but preference, I am fine with 30, others need 60. Once you hit 20 range it starts to get choppy. If you havent got the card you I would recommend against it, as that is by no means a gaming card.


Oh, well. And, what would be better: play in high settings or ultra settings with low fps or play on medium with 50 or higher fps?
As for me I wouldn't buy the card but I know a guy that's selling a PC with the following specifications and it's cheap for what is it:
AMD Phenom II 955 x4
AMD Radeon 6670
Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3 (Socket M2)
488gb SATA Samsung Hard Drive
4gb Double Chanel DDR3
MS-Windows 7 64-bit SP1
It costs 3000 pesos here in Argentina that is about 518 dollars, but here the thing's are much more expensive, so i'm going to upgrade later, maybe a few months or something...


That setup gets me 30-40 fps on battlefield 3 low at 1680 by 1050. Crysis 2 runs a 30 on low at 1600x900.


And 1680 by 1050 is okay i guess right? In a 5ms monitor?


Its fine for me. Its about on par with console fps, but with better visuals.'

1680x 1050 is my native btw
m
0
l
October 5, 2013 11:28:25 AM

thanks Jaxem, that really cleared it all up for me, i understand it much better now
m
0
l
October 5, 2013 11:48:04 AM

shellls45 said:
blue_sTyl3 said:
shellls45 said:
blue_sTyl3 said:
Gam3r01 said:
The higher your settings are the lower your fps is. Theres a relation there that never changes. There is no problem at lower fps but preference, I am fine with 30, others need 60. Once you hit 20 range it starts to get choppy. If you havent got the card you I would recommend against it, as that is by no means a gaming card.


Oh, well. And, what would be better: play in high settings or ultra settings with low fps or play on medium with 50 or higher fps?
As for me I wouldn't buy the card but I know a guy that's selling a PC with the following specifications and it's cheap for what is it:
AMD Phenom II 955 x4
AMD Radeon 6670
Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3 (Socket M2)
488gb SATA Samsung Hard Drive
4gb Double Chanel DDR3
MS-Windows 7 64-bit SP1
It costs 3000 pesos here in Argentina that is about 518 dollars, but here the thing's are much more expensive, so i'm going to upgrade later, maybe a few months or something...


That setup gets me 30-40 fps on battlefield 3 low at 1680 by 1050. Crysis 2 runs a 30 on low at 1600x900.


And 1680 by 1050 is okay i guess right? In a 5ms monitor?


Its fine for me. Its about on par with console fps, but with better visuals.'

1680x 1050 is my native btw


ok, now, here's another thing, the guy selled the pc,
and i'm seriously considering of building this system due to my budget:
Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology GA-78LMT-USB3
CPU: AMD FX 6300
Graphics Card: not sure if to pick AMD Radeon Sapphire HD 7790, or GeForce GTX 650 Ti, they're the same price and have almost the same specs.
HD: Western Digital 500gb
RAM: 4gb Kingston
Case: Sentey Ds1-4234
Thanks!

m
0
l
!