Crossfire or SLI for three monitor gaming

Cyler12

Honorable
Sep 20, 2013
145
0
10,690
I am building my first computer and something I can not decide is the correct GPU. I have three 21.5" monitors at 1920x1080, so at 5760x1080 when put together. I want game on all three obviously. A single 7990 will be $100 cheaper roughly but less effective to my understanding. I would love to save the $100 but if I can't game at ultra settings then I will gladly buy the two 7970 GE's. For about the price of the 7990 I can get two GTX 760 4GB in SLI. Power is not an issue either, I have the Corsair AX1200i. Or maybe a single GTX model around $600-$700. Any ideas?

Let's use Battlefield 3 as the standard for ultra setting gaming.

Update after a long talk about what is best I went with the Matrix 280x. This thread turned into a discussion/debate of which is better, AMD or Nvidia if you would like to read on.
 
Solution
well amd announced their r9 290x GPU and the NDA for the specifics are to be taken down on the 14th soo, its going to be released in 2 weeks no?

either way, thats what id get. the 7990 has issues with heat dissipation and the power limitations due to the 2 8pins and coil while. 2 760s will not have enough vram to drive the extra panels (4gb editions arent of any help when the GPU core itself isnt powerful enough)
well amd announced their r9 290x GPU and the NDA for the specifics are to be taken down on the 14th soo, its going to be released in 2 weeks no?

either way, thats what id get. the 7990 has issues with heat dissipation and the power limitations due to the 2 8pins and coil while. 2 760s will not have enough vram to drive the extra panels (4gb editions arent of any help when the GPU core itself isnt powerful enough)
 
Solution

RussK1

Splendid


Exactly. And pricing according to research is going to be around $600usd.
 

Cyler12

Honorable
Sep 20, 2013
145
0
10,690


Once again, how do we know this?
 

Cyler12

Honorable
Sep 20, 2013
145
0
10,690


I would ask but its too late, having the monitors already. I really don't want to return them.
 

RussK1

Splendid
I've been there and done that. It's cool but grew tired of game compatibility and having to use widescreenfixer... And how annoyingly bright it is at night. I ditched the eyefinity setup in favor of a single larger format display and higher resolution.
 


Eyefinity allows for more monitor configurations, such as landscape and portrait mixes. However, if you do a traditional Portrait or Landscape setup, Surround is equally good, and has better SLI support. The idea that the 760 can't drive 4Gb is just as much non-sense as a 7970 not being able to drive 3Gb. If a game needs that much vram, and the card is able to handle the settings then it will use the extra vram without issue. The problem is that it is rare for a game to use more than 2Gb at playable FPS.

Anyways, it is extremely rare for a 2-way SLI setup to need more than 2Gb even at 5760x1080. The settings needed to need more vram is beyond the cards ability to deliver good FPS anyways. In the exceptions, you can reduce AA and fix it in all cases I've seen, that or get a 4Gb card. The only thing true about a 760 not being able to drive 4gb, is that the settings needed to need more than 2Gb is higher than most any card can handle in the extremely rare cases that settings even exist to need more than 2Gb, even at 5760x1080.

Given Eyefinity lacking frame pacing, and even Dx9, I'd stick with SLI for now.
 

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum

_________________

+1
 


Neither perform better in 99% of the games because games just don't use more than 2Gb except in rare occasion.
 

Cyler12

Honorable
Sep 20, 2013
145
0
10,690


since you have been there, what card(s) did you use effectively? That is what kind of answer I'm looking for.
 

RussK1

Splendid


6990's.

Worked well despite a few hicups being quad. Overall th experience was good contrary to what people say or "think".

My last two gen of cards have been nVidia but that's not saying I won't go AMD (and I might).