Right now I have a GTX 460 and it's really annoying. I can't even play The Witcher 2 with it on Ultra. It only gives me around 20 FPS there.
I saw that new AMD cards are coming out. They are based on the old ones but are faster and also cheaper. The 290 is coming later but I found out that it is going to be an expensive high end card and will cost $500+ which is a bit much.
What I need help with is deciding which is most future proof. For how long would a R9 290X actually be fine for games on Ultra?
What I am trying to say is, would it be wiser to simply buy a GPU now with half the cost of a 290X and then in a few years use the other half for a new actual GPU? That way the money would further since buying a cheaper card now could probably play most things easily, right?
How fast will a 290X "get old"? Graphics right now seems to evolve pretty quick and I wouldn't be surprised if by the end of next year there'd be games that it couldn't play at max smoothly anymore.
I saw that new AMD cards are coming out. They are based on the old ones but are faster and also cheaper. The 290 is coming later but I found out that it is going to be an expensive high end card and will cost $500+ which is a bit much.
What I need help with is deciding which is most future proof. For how long would a R9 290X actually be fine for games on Ultra?
What I am trying to say is, would it be wiser to simply buy a GPU now with half the cost of a 290X and then in a few years use the other half for a new actual GPU? That way the money would further since buying a cheaper card now could probably play most things easily, right?
How fast will a 290X "get old"? Graphics right now seems to evolve pretty quick and I wouldn't be surprised if by the end of next year there'd be games that it couldn't play at max smoothly anymore.