yea, you are right, the R7 250 is a little bit slower than the 7750, but faster than the 7730
(image) [img]
Full test:
(link)
[/quotemsg]
@dome94 and
@Jesse Fitzpatrick
The conclusion and the link given by dome94 is very inaccurate.
Reasons:
1. the link he/she gives compares a slower/lower power version of the R7 250 to the 7750. It does not compare the standard version of the R7 250 with the 7750. AMD's naming flop is seen here, but the point to be taken is in the next point
2. The correct Toms review of the standard R7 250 is at [url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r7-240-and-250,3717.html]http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r7-240-and-250,3717.html[/url]
3. The correct image comparing the standard R7-250 with the 7750 (and to the 7770) is [url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r7-240-and-250,3717-10.html]http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r7-240-and-250,3717-10.html[/url]
In the image in this page, you will see that R7-250 is 90-92% as fast as the 7750, despite having 128 less shaders.
Please see the links I have given, I believe they are more accurate.
(and I don't know why the final post has some weird code included at the end. sorry.)